Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-10 Thread Paolo Cacciari
AFAIK, XRC incremental resynch is a GDPS-only feature. I've never seen non GDPS/XRC users using it. Paolo Cacciari - IBM BCRS Italy From: Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Date: 07/06/2013 00:09 Subject:Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-10 Thread Mike Schwab
PPRC has a bit map for updated tracks. If a mirroring set becomes suspended, you can resume the mirroring and just the updated tracks are sent. On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Paolo Cacciari paolo.cacci...@it.ibm.com wrote: AFAIK, XRC incremental resynch is a GDPS-only feature. I've never seen

Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-07 Thread Andrew Metcalfe
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: 07 June 2013 05:24 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home Actually, once Site A was down and Site B was Production, you should have established mirroring from Site B to Site

Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-07 Thread VanBebber, Edmond@CIO
Subject: Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home When we perform a region switch we reverse XRC replication before bringing up the production systems. Essentially as follows (some sequences shortened/omitted!) Shut down Region A production systems Shut down SDM in Region B Start SDM system

XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-06 Thread Ed VanBebber
After running production in a recovery site for some time, if you want to return operations back to the original application region, does XRC do a full volume resync or an incremental resync? I’ve read that XRC can do an incremental resync when returning home if you are configured with region

Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-06 Thread Skip Robinson
-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile jo.skip.robin...@sce.com From: Ed VanBebber edmond.vanbeb...@state.ca.gov To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, Date: 06/06/2013 11:34 AM Subject:XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN

Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-06 Thread VanBebber, Edmond@CIO
, 2013 2:09 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home If you are truly 'running production in a recovery site', then you cannot just 'return operations back to the original application region'. I hate to sound pedantic, but running production anywhere other

Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-06 Thread Mike Schwab
Of Skip Robinson Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 2:09 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home If you are truly 'running production in a recovery site', then you cannot just 'return operations back to the original application region'. I hate to sound pedantic

Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-06 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 5:10 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home With PPRC, you would break the pairs and re-establish in the opposite direction. When are all replicated

Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-06 Thread Skip Robinson
Office 323-715-0595 Mobile jo.skip.robin...@sce.com From: Pommier, Rex R. rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, Date: 06/06/2013 04:31 PM Subject:Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Ed

Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-06 Thread Joel C. Ewing
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com From: Pommier, Rex R. rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, Date: 06/06/2013 04:31 PM Subject:Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Ed brings up an interesting question. So

Re: XRC Volume Resync on a Return Home

2013-06-06 Thread Mike Schwab
Actually, once Site A was down and Site B was Production, you should have established mirroring from Site B to Site A in case a problem happened at Site B and you needed to resume at Site A with the data from Site B. On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com wrote: