Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-05 Thread Clark Morris
On 3 Aug 2010 07:46:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the article. Some companies still employ an older mainframe with a screen known as a 3270 terminal emulator, which evokes the decades-old Disk Operating System, or

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-05 Thread Clark Morris
On 3 Aug 2010 11:04:09 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: The company commands 85 percent of the mainframe market and can't afford to abandon a technology that despite its age, still underpins some 10,000 mainframes that are used by 4,000 to 5,000 customers around the globe. and The

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-05 Thread Mark Post
On 8/5/2010 at 02:37 PM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: As someone whose mainframe training in the 1960's was OJT on DOS and a combination of OJT, some employer sponsored IBM courses and SHARE attendance in the late 1970s an 1980s, I question the need for operating specific

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Alan Schenck
If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest that we involve the likes of Jamie Hyneman, Adam Savage, Tory Belleci, Kari Byron, and Grant Imahara? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Schenck Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 9:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Alan Schenck
Dude. One word cement truck. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Steve Comstock
Alan Schenck wrote: Dude. One word cement truck. Clueless. -- Kind regards, -Steve Comstock The Trainer's Friend, Inc. 303-393-8716 http://www.trainersfriend.com * To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment! + Training your people is an excellent investment

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Mark Pace
One of the larger explosions on Myth Busters was a cement truck. It was completely packed with C4. When it went off, the cement truck disappeared. On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.comwrote: Alan Schenck wrote: Dude. One word cement truck.

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Steve Comstock
Alan Schenck wrote: If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest that we involve the likes of Jamie Hyneman, Adam Savage, Tory Belleci, Kari Byron, and Grant Imahara? Duh! I don't know any of those names. Sorry, but the allusion is just lost, and I suspect I'm not the only one. -- Kind

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
TV show called mythbusters. Great program! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 9:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe Alan Schenck

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Bonno, Tuco
out of curiosity, do you recall just how they managed to get ahold of *that much* C4? you're talking about 8 CUBIC YARDS of the stuff in the mixer, if it really really was completely packed .. I used the stuff on occasion in viet-nam, and believe me, you don't need 8 cubic yards of that

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Howard Brazee
On 3 Aug 2010 22:16:33 -0700, timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) wrote: Yet that's exactly what's NOT happening (or at least not happening fast enough) in the rest of computing -- and that's a big problem for individual businesses and for the planet. Remember those old movies which

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Ron Hawkins
You have to stay in more, and watch TV. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 7:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bonno, Tuco Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe out of curiosity, do you recall just how they

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Kirk Talman
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 08/03/2010 10:45:09 AM: From: John P Kalinich jkali...@csc.com I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the article. Some companies still employ an older mainframe with a screen known as a 3270 terminal

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Mark Pace
Youtube of Cement truck turning into confetti. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxm_qpKh7Jw On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:17 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bonno,

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Bonno, Tuco
I'm still trying to figure out, what was the myth they were trying to expose? I've watched the show a few times and always found it interesting, but each time I have seen it, they were trying to get to the bottom of something, the something in question being the myth . maybe I'm just ignernt

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread John H Kington
The myth was that someone took too long to empty the cement out of the truck, allowed it to harden and then tried to use dynamite to clean out the hardened cement. Regards, John 513-723-7527 john.king...@convergys.com From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Bonno, Tuco
ah. ok. thank you. /s/ tuco bonno; Graduate, College of Conflict Management; University of SouthEast Asia; I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! The myth was that someone took too long to empty the cement out of the truck, allowed it to harden and then tried to use dynamite to

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Rick Fochtman
Steve Comstock wrote: Alan Schenck wrote: If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest that we involve the likes of Jamie Hyneman, Adam Savage, Tory Belleci, Kari Byron, and Grant Imahara? Duh! I don't know any of those names. Sorry, but the allusion is just lost, and I suspect I'm not

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip out of curiosity, do you recall just how they managed to get ahold of *that much* C4? you're talking about 8 CUBIC YARDS of the stuff in the mixer, if it really really was completely packed .. I used the

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip--- but how many people who read the article know what odiferous horse hockey it is? --unsnip--- We should be working to help our management realize

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-04 Thread zMan
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote: We should be working to help our management realize just what that horse hockey really means. NOTHING!!! But they're so cute, on their little skates, with their four legs going in all directions...

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread John P Kalinich
I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the article. Some companies still employ an older mainframe with a screen known as a 3270 terminal emulator, which evokes the decades-old Disk Operating System, or DOS, that predated Microsoft (MSFT) Windows

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Steve Comstock
John P Kalinich wrote: I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the article. Some companies still employ an older mainframe with a screen known as a 3270 terminal emulator, which evokes the decades-old Disk Operating System, or DOS, that predated Microsoft (MSFT) Windows

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Ken Porowski
I guess if we did it consistently and often enough we might get a reporter or two to check their facts but as they are probably not Mainframe savvy (or even tech savvy) I doubt it would get anywhere. Perhaps if we targeted the editor of the publication pointing out the shoddy reporting of their

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Howard Brazee
On 3 Aug 2010 09:10:45 -0700, ken.porow...@cit.com (Ken Porowski) wrote: I guess if we did it consistently and often enough we might get a reporter or two to check their facts but as they are probably not Mainframe savvy (or even tech savvy) I doubt it would get anywhere. Perhaps if we targeted

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
--snip-- Yeah, so, do we have a responsiblity to point up the error of such careless reporting? Is it in our (mainframer's) best interest to send emails decrying the sloppy reporting? Do we let the myth continue?

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip-- I guess if we did it consistently and often enough we might get a reporter or two to check their facts but as they are probably not Mainframe savvy (or even tech savvy) I doubt it would get anywhere. Perhaps if we targeted the

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
--snip--- I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the article. Some companies still employ an older mainframe with a screen known as a 3270 terminal emulator, which evokes the decades-old Disk

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread J. D. Cassidy
Too much trouble.. send him and the other mouse-twitching folks to Kolyma. = --snip--- = =I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the = article. = =Some companies still employ an older mainframe with a

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
The company commands 85 percent of the mainframe market and can't afford to abandon a technology that despite its age, still underpins some 10,000 mainframes that are used by 4,000 to 5,000 customers around the globe. and The number of mainframes today has dropped to about 10,000, from 30,000

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Bonno, Tuco
better yet, to Vorkuta (or did they dismantle that place after 1989?) /s/ tuco bonno; Graduate, College of Conflict Management; University of SouthEast Asia; I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! Too much trouble.. send him and the other mouse-twitching folks to Kolyma.

Re: [**SPAM**] Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread J. D. Cassidy
Serious topic yaw here. Koyma was / is more famous.. = better yet, to Vorkuta (or did they dismantle that place after 1989?) = = /s/ tuco bonno; = Graduate, College of Conflict Management; = University of SouthEast Asia; = I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! = = = =Too

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip- The company commands 85 percent of the mainframe market and can't afford to abandon a technology that despite its age, still underpins some 10,000 mainframes that are used by 4,000 to 5,000 customers around

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Rick Fochtman
--snip--- better yet, to Vorkuta (or did they dismantle that place after 1989?) /s/ tuco bonno; Graduate, College of Conflict Management; University of SouthEast Asia; I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !!

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Eric Bielefeld
I think my experience in Milwaukee bears out the quoted text below. When I first started as a systems programmer, there were approximately 30 to 40 mainframe shops. We had a group that met quarterly until about 1991, and we'd often get at least 30 shops represented. Now, to my best

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Mark Pace
I see the same thing here in Tallahassee. In the early 80's every State agency, the school board, the county government, and multiple banks all had mainframes and staff. That was probably 15-20 mainframes. Now there are about 5 left in the State. The school board, county government and banks

Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe

2010-08-03 Thread Timothy Sipples
There's a lot of sloppy reporting in the world. But it still amazes me that so many people would get things so wrong when it comes to the number of machines and what it signifies. If the world of computing were actually materially advancing, we would fully expect the number of machines to