On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:57:52 + Hall, Keven keh...@informatica.com
wrote:
:The next most efficient technique after using a sanctioned slot in the area
referenced by ECVTCTBL is Name/Token services. A System-level Name/Token in
would be needed in this case.
I wonder if IBM has reserved some
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:17:31 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
on 04/10/2013 at 08:27 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:52:55 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
on 04/07/2013 at 04:57 PM, Sam Siegel said:
diff3 allows a 3 way merge between the original source and 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41U78QP8nBk
1961 IBM 7094 sings Daisy.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com wrote:
Steve Marak wrote:
It would all be a lot funnier to me if I didn't frequently run into people
who *believe* Hollywood's conception of computers, computer
In 5165dc62.1090...@valley.net, on 04/10/2013
at 05:40 PM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net said:
FSVO normal. CIRB uses either an SVC 43, or its branch entry, and f
or my use the 2nd level exit effector was shorter (both OS/360 and
MVS).
So you did your own GETMAIN for the IRB and the
In fa4904a2-2c4a-4ed6-8ea5-2014e6d02...@comcast.net, on 04/10/2013
at 04:53 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net said:
I won't argue the point but the fact that it (VB) just became
available
It isn't a fact; MVS has supported RECFM=VB for subsystem data sets
since OS/VS2 Release 2.
--
In
CANij+dcXAE+TqGKWjXDg-Fb=kijc0jdchrrjnhabjwuzxov...@mail.gmail.com,
on 04/10/2013
at 06:13 PM, William Donzelli wdonze...@gmail.com said:
So I have some time to look into this now, but the listing is fairly
cryptic. Do you know specifically which models or special features
you want data
In 5227567289602393.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
04/12/2013
at 01:48 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Sam said diff3 _allows_ a 3 way merge, which is correct, not that it
_performs_ a 3-way merge, which you appear to be imputing to him
A normal reading of diff3
On 12 Apr 2013 06:16:09 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
In
CANij+dcXAE+TqGKWjXDg-Fb=kijc0jdchrrjnhabjwuzxov...@mail.gmail.com,
on 04/10/2013
at 06:13 PM, William Donzelli wdonze...@gmail.com said:
So I have some time to look into this now, but the listing is fairly
cryptic. Do you
shmuel+...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
A normal reading of diff3 allows a 3 way merge would be that there
are options to diff3 that cause it to perform the merge. Did you read
it as diff3 creates output that you are allowed to feed into an
external program in order to do
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:09:33 -0400, Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
note diff3 ... but later, I did do trivial program that helped in the
process. one was given two similar sources with old new sequence
numbers ... would generate an update for the old sequence numbers that
represented the difference
paulgboul...@aim.com (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
Was your trivial program made available to end customers, or were
they compelled to reinvent it?
I've done most of these operations using SuperC with the UPDCMS8
option in place of your program; the UPDMVS8 option is practically
worthless for
G'Day,
I didn't get a response to my post earlier. Would anybody have an answer?
Thanks.
- Forwarded Message -
From: John Dawes jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au
To: IBM Main ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, 4 April 2013 4:02 PM
Subject: LOOKING FOR EXAMPLE - ABARS BACKUP TO DISK
G'Day
On 4/12/2013 8:22 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
So you did your own GETMAIN for the IRB and the IQE/RQE?
No; they are hardcoded.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, Vermont
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Mainframe computing at ATT in 1973...
http://mainframe.typepad.com/blog/2013/04/ibm-mainframe-computing-at-att-in-
1973.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On 4/12/2013 12:08 PM, John Dawes wrote:
I didn't get a response to my post earlier. Would anybody have an answer?
Perhaps because you didn't provide much information, such as your
complete JCL, or what error(s) you are getting.
My first guess would be that a DASD backup would go to a
On 4/12/2013 10:05 AM, Clark Morris wrote:
As an aside, has anyone emulated any of the above or a 650 on Intel?
any of the early computers from other manufacturers?
A google search for 7094 simulator (and 7094 emulator) will turn up
simulator source (one in C, one Delphi), and $IBSYS. I also
Cross-posted to the IBMVM, Linux-390, and IBM-MAIN discussion lists.
The 2013 VM Workshop will be conducted JUNE 20-22 at Indiana University-Purdue
University Indianapolis in beautiful downtown Indianapolis, IN. Session are
planned from about 9AM Thursday June 20, through about 2PM Saturday,
Cross-posted to Linux-390, IBMVM, and IBM-MAIN discussion lists.
To: VM Workshop attendees and those who would like to attend,
Background: The VM Workshop is a very inexpensive (registration still only
$100, just as for the last 2 years), all-volunteer, 2.5 day technical
conference held in
Hi John,
If your sample is what you actually have coded, the
Volser would be ignored because there is a space in there instead of a comma -
UNIT=3390 VOL(ZYSMA0)
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:08 AM, John Dawes jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
UNIT=3390 VOL(ZYSMA0)
Hi John,
We have FDR but not ABARS here, so FWIW -
I noticed that there is a space instead of a comma -
UNIT=3390 VOL(ZYSMA0) but depending on where your snip came from - jcl,
instream, it may be okay.
For more than a guess, it is best to include full job statements, error
messages, etc.
We have a protected Id working fine for years. Recently someone tried to
use a password with it in an NDM process. Ever since that event, any
attempt to use that Id in an NDM process errors out with RACF002I, The
Security Interface found the PASSWORD specified was not valid for the
USERID
What is NDM? What product (apparently not RACF) issued the RACF002I message?
Does RACF still show the user as protected?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Biller, Charles A (CHUCK)
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 1:53
Peter,
You cannot convert a 10017 Cyl 3390-9 to a 32760 Cyl 3390-9.
You can use DFSMSdss or similar to physically copy from a 10017 Cyl to a
32760 Cyl volume, and this must be followed by a REFVTOC so the VTOC is
aware of the new volume size. You cannot merge three volumes into one unless
you do
According to the message - Contact Connect Direct support person at your shop.
If you are that person, you need to see if there are other messages in SYSLOG
or JOB Log that would help. Otherwise, Probably contact the vendor for
assistance.
Lizette
RACF002I
You should use the size that corresponds to your actual workload and
configuration. If you use a structure that's too small, you'll get fewer lock
table entries and may encounter more false contention (when distinct resources
hash to the same lock table entry) and degraded performance. If you
You shouldn't make the maximum size too large.
There is a somewhat new health check called XCF_CF_STR_POLICYSIZE that Check
that structures in the CFRM active policy do not have too large a difference
between the value specified for INITSIZE and |the value specified for SIZE. All
26 matches
Mail list logo
