Hi all
We want to migrate from GDPS 3.12 to GDPS metro 4.1.
There are two migration procedures: 1. Big Bang migration
and 2 Enhanced migration
Could you tell us which migration procedure could be chosen to
migrate from GDPS 3.12 to GDPS metro 4.1 directly.
Is there any relevant
"(I'm assuming that last usage of "RLS" > should be "LSR".)"
No. RLS and LST are *VERY* different.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Edward Gould
Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2018 1:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
The point made was that the paragraph did not make sense as printed. The
suggestion was *not* that LSR and RLS were equivalent.
> On Jun 4, 2018, at 08:26, Allan Staller wrote:
>
> "(I'm assuming that last usage of "RLS" > should be "LSR".)"
>
> No. RLS and LST are *VERY* different.
A very interesting history, Mark. Thanks for sharing.
And thanks for your service, too.
DJ
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 07:38:02 -0400, Mark Regan wrote:
>Sharing since IBM is mentioned several times in this article. I was a CTO
>in the Navy from 1969 to 1991 (part of that was in the reserves from 1979
Sharing since IBM is mentioned several times in this article. I was a CTO
in the Navy from 1969 to 1991 (part of that was in the reserves from 1979
to 1991).
https://stationhypo.com/2018/06/04/history-of-the-information-system-technology-it-rating/
--
Regards,
Mark T. Regan
>if SVCs architecturally have this restriction
SVCs do not architecturally have this restriction.
Given what I know in general (not specific to USS), I would not make the
assumption that "...because the SVC 144 routine uses register 14 to exit"
is true.
It might be true that a modification to
Peter Relson wrote:
if SVCs architecturally have this restriction
SVCs do not architecturally have this restriction.
Given what I know in general (not specific to USS), I would not make the
assumption that "...because the SVC 144 routine uses register 14 to exit"
is true.
It might be
3.12 to 4.1 will require Big Bang method.
Chapter 1, topic 1.4, "Migration and coexistence" of the "Installation and
Customization Guide" has the details.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Jason Cai wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We want to migrate from GDPS 3.12 to GDPS metro 4.1.
>
> There are two
This is good feedback and definitely worthy of a requirement, so
consider opening one. I'll direct my IPCS content developers to this
thread as a heads up.
-Sue Shumway
On 06/04/18 11:28 AM, Don Poitras wrote:
In article <1599371286812594.wa.zos.jes2gmail@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
On 06/04/2018 12:29 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
> [Default] On 4 Jun 2018 08:14:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> edja...@phoenixsoftware.com (Ed Jaffe) wrote:
>
>> On 6/3/2018 10:07 PM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>>
>>> The LE transaction dump *requires* JES2, hence HWIBCPII *requires* JES2 (if
>>> only
Thanks for the responses.
I did receive an explanation that OPTS UTF8 ON is not the problem. The Windows
10 FTP client uses a different function to read the password and always reads
it from stdin.
This is something we send out to customers so we have to expect they may not
have anything
Thanks Wayne,
The reason for the request is like you said, the DOC is quite lacking. You can
get some info from reading the macros but that's really not how DOC should be
done.
The only three that I've had issues with are ADPLSEQS, ADPLSMAP and maybe
ADPLSSYM. With the little doc/examples
Sorry, I meant that I got the OTHERS working well but these three have me
confused.
Thanks,
Dan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Yes, I reported issues with both the z/OS 2.1 and 2.2 pdf libraries to IBM last
Friday afternoon. I received a reply that someone by the name of Geoff Smith is
looking into them. I will forward this email to him as well. (Thank you! I
wasn't hallucinating this time!)
Mike
-Original
I noticed the problem last week and it still has not been resolved.
(much to my annoyance)
Dejan Stamatovic
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Hopefully this is not a stupid question - but is it possibly via RACF (maybe
with DASDVOL) to allow a particular system to have only read access to a DASD
volume? We have a need to possibly vary some devices onto a system in one plex
while it is being updated on another plex, so we would like
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:27:25 -0500, Todd Burrell wrote:
>Hopefully this is not a stupid question - but is it possibly via RACF (maybe
>with DASDVOL) to allow a particular system to have only read access to a DASD
>volume? We have a need to possibly vary some devices onto a system in one
>plex
If you were not aware there is a RACF list that this question might also be
posted to
To join, if you have not done so
RACFhttp://www.listserv.uga.edu/archives/racf-l.html
A side comment, I would not allow DASD Sharing between plexes. Within members
of a PLEX, yes. Between Plexes, no
Are we not smart enough to deal with such things?
GRS special processing, hardware reserves, MIM..or for sysprogs.. just
being careful?
Should some restraint be exercised? Sure.. but let's not act like we are
just another server without ways to do just about anything ( some more
advisable than
Ed,
please reread my first post!
>If that's the case, then the fault lies with LE and not BCPii.
How is LE to know that it runs under an implicit sub=mstr? That is not how your
standard Cobol/PL/I program runs.
What started this off was our general setting of HEAPCHK(ON) on request of
An SMS volume from a system without the volume defined to a storage
group is pretty darn resistant. But they generally don't need this
kind of treatment.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:27 PM Todd Burrell wrote:
>
> Hopefully this is not a stupid question - but is it possibly via RACF (maybe
> with
How many Cindy's do you have?
Chris Hoelscher
Humana.com
(502) 476-2538 or 407-7266
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rob Schramm
Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 10:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN]
Excellent point. I ran across this ( at the time it was a pesky problem )
which kept me from at least creating datasets on a SMS volume that's part
of another Cindy.
Rob Schramm
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 10:37 PM Mike Schwab wrote:
> An SMS volume from a system without the volume defined to a
Don, thanks for the C sample. I'll convert it over to assemble and see if I
can get something working.
Susan, I appreciate that you've noticed this and will be helping to get the
manuals updated. I have heard from others in the past that there is more
useful information within the mapping
On 6/4/2018 10:29 AM, Clark Morris wrote:
CEEDUMP may default to SYSOUT=*. It's long enough since I dealt with
these things that I do;t know how it should be changed for SUB=MSTR.
If that's the case, then the fault lies with LE and not BCPii.
If the allocation for CEEDUMP fails, then the
As I said this was probably a stupid question. I suspect that from what I have
seen MIM may be a solution, but we will look more.
Thanks for the info, Walt.
This email transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain CSX
privileged and confidential information intended only for
PER uses program interrupts, not an SVC.
That said, calling an SVC does not normally alter R14; the SVC would have to do
something unusual.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:21:52 +, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>Sorry for wasting bandwidth, I missed the part where you wanted the "password
>not in the script" option. I didn't realize the Win 7 FTP did that and that
>Win 10 does not since I always just used "password in the script" for my
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:58:31 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>PER uses program interrupts, not an SVC.
>
>That said, calling an SVC does not normally alter R14; the SVC would have to
>do something unusual.
>
Does either PER or SVC preserve the program mask (CC, ILC, ...)?
If so, that's the one dbx
Anyone else having trouble accessing the V2R2 PDF's from
https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zosInternetLibrary?OpenDocument
?
When I select "Download books in PDF format" I receive the expected shortcut
list.
If is select z/OS MVS, I get different page that
Sorry for wasting bandwidth, I missed the part where you wanted the "password
not in the script" option. I didn't realize the Win 7 FTP did that and that
Win 10 does not since I always just used "password in the script" for my
personal use.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM
> It pays to read before write...
That's the whole subject here, right? VSAM files won't do that.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 8:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
PMFJI here, but that is simply not true of Win 10 FTP in my experience. My
company machine is Windows 10 Pro and the FTP command and script files that I
use look like this (anonymized):
CMD file:
ftp -s:c:\ut\ftpscript.ftp xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
ftpscript.ftp:
tsouser
password
quote site notrail
Is there a history to operating the analog firing computers I.E. WW2 era?
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Mark Regan wrote:
> Sharing since IBM is mentioned several times in this article. I was a CTO
> in the Navy from 1969 to 1991 (part of that was in the reserves from 1979
> to 1991).
>
>
Just to clarify. The 1st page is fine. Once you start to drill down, issues are
encountered.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Susan Shumway
Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 10:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
On 6/3/2018 10:07 PM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
The LE transaction dump *requires* JES2, hence HWIBCPII *requires* JES2 (if
only in special circumstances). Which is why I call this crappy design.
LE transaction dump requires JES2? That's news to me...
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E.
Hi Dejan,
What's the URL of the page that you're trying to access?
https://www.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zosInternetLibrary
is working fine for me.
-Sue Shumway
On 06/04/18 11:01 AM, Dejan Stamatovic wrote:
I noticed the problem last week and it still has not been
In article <1599371286812594.wa.zos.jes2gmail@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
> Thanks Wayne,
> The reason for the request is like you said, the DOC is quite lacking. You
> can get some info from reading the macros but that's really not how DOC
> should be done.
> The only three that I've had
Yup, interesting thing is that the header changes to make it look like it's
heading to a different location, but it all goes back to the menu screen.
https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zosv2r2-pdf-download?OpenDocument#GIM
Nice irony how he not only misunderstood the statement, but introduced his
own typo/spelling error.
It pays to read before write...
sas
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:45 AM, J R wrote:
> The point made was that the paragraph did not make sense as printed. The
> suggestion was *not* that LSR and
Nope. That URL provides the same behavior.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Susan Shumway
Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 10:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS Internet Library Broken
Hi Dejan,
What's the
Some windoze programs inflict a BOM on you; that breaks existing software. In
some cases it is not obvious from the error message that there is a garbage
character at the beginning of the file; you have to use an editor that does not
swallow U+FEFF .
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
[Default] On 4 Jun 2018 08:14:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com (Ed Jaffe) wrote:
>On 6/3/2018 10:07 PM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>
>> The LE transaction dump *requires* JES2, hence HWIBCPII *requires* JES2 (if
>> only in special circumstances). Which is why I call this
PER definitely preserves the entire PSW. Unless the SVC routine tinkers with
RBOPSW, I would expect Exit to restore the original value.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul
We don't use RACF here, so my knowledge there is very limited, but I
have a few suggestions!!
First, the is a Netview group under Yahoo Groups, you may find more
Netview types there.
There are several errors below. The DSI148I and DSI417I errors lead me
to
Sorry guys, my newsreader only grabbed Allan's post for some reason, so I
didn't initially have the rest of the posts with the full story. Geoff was
notified and has indeed been working on this, so thank you for the notice! The
V2R1 and V2R2 PDF pages should be fixed by EOD tomorrow. In the
46 matches
Mail list logo
