Hi Folks,
Just a handy thing (in one place) that can make life easier. I
wrote it as a CLIST to keep it really simple: It is called LASTT (you
can name it more appropriately, e.g. TIMES)
PROC 0
LOGTIME /* CBT FILE 133 */
LASTIPL /* CBT FILE 300 */
LASTCLPA /* CBT
I was immediately struck by this statement:
'[T]hey surveyed 500 IT decision makers...'
So who among the members of this forum would count him/herself as an 'IT
decision maker'? I may get to toss in my two cents on hardware choices--how
much memory on the Z box, say--but the crucial highest
Sorry, I didn't see that you posted a question on the Community forum.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:50 AM Michael Babcock
wrote:
> I did post a question on the community forum and I’ve searched but I’m not
> finding an answer. I’ll find one of the Tomcat forums.
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at
BTW "84" is Singapore, FWIW.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:39:06 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
>
>H, I faintly remember something like that, but not this phrase "SW EXCEL",
>
On: https://www-01.ibm.com/software/support/offerings.html
... some mention of
...
"Okay what are the desired results? I will get you a survey to show that as
long as no one looks past the headline."
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Smith, Nathan (ATLANTA, GA)
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Yes, that was it, thank you sir! I sure wouldn't have guessed it was over a
year ago. "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana"
Dana
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:54:06 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
>The discussion is under the subject line "SoftwareXcel Discontinued",
>and it was
Hi Folks,
Just a handy thing (in one place) that can make life easier. I
wrote it as a CLIST to keep it really simple: It is called LASTT (you
can name it more appropriately, e.g. TIMES)
PROC 0
LOGTIME /* CBT FILE 133 */
LASTIPL /* CBT FILE 300 */
LASTCLPA /* CBT
It's SOP for vendors who issue CPU-based keys to require notification of
upcoming hardware changes in order to generate new keys. One particular vendor
demands to see the results of 'D M=CPU' for *every individual LPAR* on a box. I
can't tell you how supremely irritating this is. For a typical
There was also an email from Ed Jaffe on 08/23/2018 to this list that
contained links to several St. Louis SHARE presentations that he was a part of.
The Bit Bucket x'38' presentation discusses this subject and provides several
alternatives!!
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Tell us what it says, please. :-)
Seriously, if TFM fails to cover the ground adequately let us know.
Thanks, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 15 Oct 2018, at 08:24, Elardus Engelbrecht
wrote:
>
> Martin Packer wrote:
>
>> It could be because the OP expects to see the 5-character version of the
Martin Packer wrote:
>It could be because the OP expects to see the 5-character version of the CPU
>ID. But, since the advent of PR/SM we’ve only ever had the 4-character version.
>In SMF we show the 4-character in CPU Data Section in Type 70 but fuller
>versions - because I asked for them
Tony Thigpen wrote:
>Why would the D M=CPU display a wrong number.
What number? What is wrong?
Perhaps something is wrong because you read/posted it on a Sunday? ;-)
>Running z/os 1.13 on a z12-BC.
>17.13.21 HKYP d m=cpu
>17.13.21 HKYP IEE174I 17.13.21 DISPLAY M 204
It could be because the OP expects to see the 5-character version of the
CPU ID. But, since the advent of PR/SM we’ve only ever had the 4-character
version.
In SMF we show the 4-character in CPU Data Section in Type 70 but fuller
versions - because I asked for them long ago :-) - in other places
On 10/15/2018 12:19 AM, Martin Packer wrote:
Now, an interesting (to me) question is whether the 4-character version is
unique.
I've always assumed they are not *guaranteed* unique, but in practice
they seem to be. Serial numbers are so sparse that we see customers
*routinely* upgrade from
On 10/15/2018 10:54 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:
The discussion is under the subject line "SoftwareXcel Discontinued",
and it was started by Ed Jaffe on 2017-09-07 (just over a year ago).
The latest information I have on this subject is reported in the St.
Louis Bit Bucket.
Ok, I was not thinking clearly yesterday.
My 'well seasoned' z/OS systems programmer was having a FIT because he
thought someone had sent the vendor the wrong CPU-ID for an expiring
product (VTAM-Switch) that was scheduled for a key installation this
weekend. He is two timezones away and was
List,
Our vulnerability scanner is complaining about the Delete method (among
others) in DT’s Tomcat. How do I disable methods? I’m not finding much
in the doc.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Tony Thigpen wrote:
>Ok, I was not thinking clearly yesterday.
Nevermind, Sunday is supposed to be a day to rest, go to church and enjoy your
few precious times with your family, but we z/Os support don't have that
luxury, we must respond within 3.5 nanoseconds once a problem appears no matter
W dniu 2018-10-14 o 18:33, Mark Regan pisze:
https://it.toolbox.com/blogs/trevoreddolls/what-mainframers-hate-mainframes-101418
LzLabs and Microsoft told us about mainframes.
It's like wolf telling stories about sheep. Absolutely unbiased.
BTW:
I bet I can find in every mainframe shop at
I did post a question on the community forum and I’ve searched but I’m not
finding an answer. I’ll find one of the Tomcat forums.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:32 AM Kirk Wolf wrote:
> Here is information on our Tomcat packages for z/OS:
> https://dovetail.com/products/tomcat.html
>
> Questions
Indeed, as others have noted (and Eddols did in his conclusion), this is pretty
clearly specious in that the premise ("mainframers hate mainframes") is not
supported by the survey, because the report misrepresents the surveyed
population as "mainframers".
If we look at the bullets
"Lies, damned lies, and statistics."
Anthem, Inc.
Nathan A. Smith, Database Administrator Sr., Anthem Database Services
600 Peachtree St. NE, Mail Drop GA1319-A154, Atlanta, GA 30308
O: (770) 519-6496 | M: (770) 519-6496
nathanael.sm...@anthem.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
94% I doubt that you could get 94% to agree that the Sun rises in the East and
sets in the West? When the ratio gets that large, I start suspecting that the
numbers were made of the whole cloth.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Here is information on our Tomcat packages for z/OS:
https://dovetail.com/products/tomcat.html
Questions about the z/OS packaging should be directed to our Community
Forum:
http://community.dovetail.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=2
Your question is really a general Tomcat question. Best to use
I seem to remember a recent IBM-MAIN discussion about IBM withdrawal of SW
EXCEL or some portion thereof, and alternatives for the different services
such as APAR search. I can't find either the IBM-MAIN discussion or the IBM
announcement that started it all. My boss asked about our budget
Dana Mitchell wrote:
>I seem to remember a recent IBM-MAIN discussion about IBM withdrawal of SW
>EXCEL or some portion thereof, and alternatives for the different services
>such as APAR search. I can't find either the IBM-MAIN discussion or the IBM
>announcement that started it all. My
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:39:06 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht
wrote:
>
>H, I faintly remember something like that, but not this phrase "SW EXCEL",
>
I don't remember if it was exactly SW EXCEL was mentioned, but it was
basically the functions that used to be referred collectively to as IBMLINK.
The discussion is under the subject line "SoftwareXcel Discontinued",
and it was started by Ed Jaffe on 2017-09-07 (just over a year ago).
Tony H.
On 15 October 2018 at 13:49, Dana Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:39:06 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht
> wrote:
>>
>>H, I faintly
29 matches
Mail list logo
