On 2019-10-30 4:45 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On 2019-10-07 2:06 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
I'm saying that IBM can't fix this problem because the problem lies with Unix
shell design.
IBM can and have fixed the problem! BPXBATCH is so bad they wrote a
replacement AOPBATCH which works just as Kirk
So according to:
"20 The routine_name contains only blanks and the routine_entry was zero.
The PreInit table was not updated."
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceeam00/ceeam141.htm
Joe
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 8:55 PM Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> The
Yes, if you use the policy agent (PAGENT).
ITschak
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:03 AM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to encrypt TN3270 connectivity using CPACF ?
>
> Just trying to understand its functionality and has anyone tried this
> functionality implementated for TN3270
We use Rockets’s Bluezone for our 3270 emulator and all 3270 traffic uses
TLS 1.2 via IBM’s policy agent.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:03 AM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to encrypt TN3270 connectivity using CPACF ?
>
> Just trying to understand its functionality and has anyone
Brian,
Thanks for pointing that out. Wondering why IBM couldn’t have designed some
automated method to determine if the KCindex needs to be rebuilt or not? Now
the issue will be to remember to let it rebuild after a maintenance cycle? Or
z/OS release change? How will I know when it
I can’t say I’m 100% sure but highly suspect it does. We don’t have our
crypto express cards configured yet so I know it’s not using them.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:44 AM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> "We use Rockets’s Bluezone for our 3270 emulator and all 3270 traffic uses
> TLS 1.2 via IBM’s
Why do you need a DLL? Can you just use PIPI to call a static program?
On 2019-10-29 8:15 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
This is add_entry I was using INIT_SUB, INIT_MAIN regardless that’s a good idea
to try to use add_entry
After init_sub/MAIN
This is the program I trying to initiate as in
Hi
Is it possible to encrypt TN3270 connectivity using CPACF ?
Just trying to understand its functionality and has anyone tried this
functionality implementated for TN3270 connectivity.
Jake
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Try this aging SHARE presentation from 2014. You'll probably find a more recent
one if your search the web or SHARE.
https://share.confex.com/share/123/webprogram/Handout/Session15660/SharePittsburgh15660_Aug2014_System_SSL_And_Crypto.pdf
Mike Wawiorko
This e-mail and any attachments are
This is add_entry I was using INIT_SUB, INIT_MAIN regardless that’s a good idea
to try to use add_entry
After init_sub/MAIN
This is the program I trying to initiate as in Assembler LE 64 bit prolog
CELQPRLG does not have a main and I cannot call a 64 C DLL I was thinking
CELQPIPI would resolve
"We use Rockets’s Bluezone for our 3270 emulator and all 3270 traffic uses
TLS 1.2 via IBM’s policy agent"
All its workload goes to CPACF ?
On Tue, 29 Oct, 2019, 1:42 PM Michael Babcock,
wrote:
> We use Rockets’s Bluezone for our 3270 emulator and all 3270 traffic uses
> TLS 1.2 via IBM’s
I guess I could do a series of calls to the exports things is they all share a
global area
Thanks
On Oct 29, 2019, at 8:47 AM, David Crayford wrote:
>
> Why do you need a DLL? Can you just use PIPI to call a static program?
>
>> On 2019-10-29 8:15 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>> This is
I am trying to call a AMODE 64 bit C DLL (exported function) from assembler and
because CELQPRLG (LE 64 bit prologue) doesn't support main like CEEENTRY
(MAIN=YES) Cannt seem do it I thought the INIT_MAIN function for CELQPIPI would
do the trick for me
Thanks
-Original Message-
OK, I don't follow; in particular, what do you mean by "jump"?
In case it helps clarify, I am SORTing a DCOLLECT file, which for some
reason, uses "kilobytes" for normal DASD, and "megabytes" for EAV. I came
up with an INREC statement that fixes that, but I'd like to use the correct
multiplier
Joe:
What are you trying to accomplish exactly so we can better assist you ?
Scott
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> I guess I could do a series of calls to the exports things is they all
> share a global area
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2019, at 8:47 AM, David Crayford
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:23:31 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>The Dispatcher has been using timers for decades. What interrupts your
>code is an external event from a timer or from a SIGP on another CPU.
>If you're running with appropriate goals, don't try to second guess WLM.
I believe the OP
Jake Anderson asked:
>Is it possible to encrypt TN3270 connectivity using CPACF ?
And then later added:
>We got this feature along with our z14 so wanted to make use of this and am
>not sure if PAGENT traffic can be offloaded to zIIP
Just to be clear: CPACF is crypto in the chip (much
In light of the recent posts
Would anybody know if I can use INIT_MAIN using CELQPIPI to initialize a 64 bit
CELQPRLG assembler which calls a 64 bit C DLL export
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Jump in volume size. I wrote a program on a non-EAV sysplex that
divided the capacity KB by 849.960 to get the number of cylinders.
Had an off by 1 error at various sizes, so I added 1 to round up
before dividing.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Steve Smith wrote:
>
> OK, I don't follow; in
Thanks
Joe Reichman
170-10 73 rd ave
Fresh meadows NY 11366
> On Oct 29, 2019, at 1:02 PM, scott Ford wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> I have called it in Cobol . I thought there some pretty good examples in
> the IBM Doc.
> Let us know ..
>
> Scott
>
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:50 AM Joseph
On 2019-10-29 11:50 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
Peter thanks so much if I need a C main then this exercise in CELQPIPI is
irrelevant
We use CEEPIPI and don't use main. We use subroutines with the following
(this is C++ code)
#pragma linkage(FUWIPSTR, fetchable) // required for PIPI
There are two archives. You search the old one.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Steve Smith wrote:
>
> OK, I don't follow; in particular, what do you mean by "jump"?
>
> In case it helps clarify, I am SORTing a DCOLLECT file, which for some
> reason, uses "kilobytes" for normal DASD, and
We got this feature along with our z14 so wanted to make use of this and am
not sure if PAGENT traffic can be offloaded to zIIP
On Tue, 29 Oct, 2019, 9:26 PM R.S., wrote:
> Michael,
> It's not so easy.
> You use encrypted communication. That's what you know.
> However you don't know what
Peter thanks so much if I need a C main then this exercise in CELQPIPI is
irrelevant
Now I need to figure out how to call a C main from non LE assembler as all of
my code is that
On Oct 29, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Farley, Peter x23353
wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> From my somewhat limited experience
OK, after I found my old 3390 reference card, and doing the math, I proved
that DCOLLECT is indeed using 2**10 to mean kilo- (and presumably 2**20 for
mega-). I found a 3390-3 (I think) with 3,339 cylinders, and multiplied by
849,960 (bytes/cyl) and got 2838016440, which /1024 = 2771500.4296875.
Joe,
I have called it in Cobol . I thought there some pretty good examples in
the IBM Doc.
Let us know ..
Scott
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:50 AM Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> Peter thanks so much if I need a C main then this exercise in CELQPIPI is
> irrelevant
>
> Now I need to figure out how to
Joe,
I havent dont 64bit C ..but I would be surprised the guys here on the
listserv havent .
I understand 64bit in theory but working as a ISV my mgmt is stuck in the
Cobol back woods.
Scott
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:42 AM Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> I am trying to call a AMODE 64 bit C DLL
It was my understanding after a lot of digging that I couldn’t call 64 bit C
from assembler because the 64 bit LE assembler prologue macro CELQPRLG doesn’t
support main like CEEENTRY and there for the LE environment isn’t established I
just thought that CELQPIPI would do that for assembler
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:58:00 -0400, Steve Smith wrote:
>OK, after I found my old 3390 reference card, and doing the math, I proved
>that DCOLLECT is indeed using 2**10 to mean kilo- (and presumably 2**20 for
>mega-). I found a 3390-3 (I think) with 3,339 cylinders, and multiplied by
>849,960
W dniu 2019-10-29 o 17:58, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:58:00 -0400, Steve Smith wrote:
OK, after I found my old 3390 reference card, and doing the math, I proved
that DCOLLECT is indeed using 2**10 to mean kilo- (and presumably 2**20 for
mega-). I found a 3390-3 (I think)
Joe,
From my somewhat limited experience with CEEPIPI (only to enable 31-bit COBOL
calls from 31-bit non-LE assembler subroutines called from 31-bit COBOL main),
it looks to me like your 64-bit assembler code needs to set up a CEEPIPI
INIT_SUB not an INIT_MAIN since you are calling the DLL as
Michael,
It's not so easy.
You use encrypted communication. That's what you know.
However you don't know what hardware is used for enciphering/deciphering
data.
I'm rather sure that it is NOT CryptoExpress card (let's omit
handshaking). Note, CPACF is not CryptoExpress. You can have CPACF and
On Sunday, October 6, 2019, 08:14:36 PM PDT, David Crayford
wrote:
>On 2019-10-07 2:06 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
>> I'm saying that IBM can't fix this problem because the problem lies with
>> Unix shell design.
> IBM can and have fixed the problem! BPXBATCH is so bad they wrote a
Welcome back.
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:21:07 +, Jon Perryman wrote:
>
>On Sunday, October 6, 2019, 08:14:36 PM PDT, David Crayford wrote:
>
> >On 2019-10-07 2:06 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
>
>>> I'm saying that IBM can't fix this problem because the problem lies with
>>> Unix shell
No, I do not. The old one is pre-2005.
Aha... specifying a "since" date of 2016-01-01 gets me up to the present.
It seems there's a hard limit of 100 hits, and it starts from the oldest.
sas
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 2:53 PM Mike Schwab wrote:
> There are two archives. You search the old one.
Yep, looking at the z/os xl c/c++ manuals there are examples of Hlasm
calling C,
You have to use XPLINK for 64bit and there are prologs and epilogs.
Scott
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 2:22 PM David Crayford wrote:
> On 2019-10-29 11:50 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> > Peter thanks so much if I need a
I think the only scenario that would work from a non LE assembler is calling a
main 64 bit C which would than call the 64 C DLL
Joe Reichman
170-10 73 rd ave
Fresh meadows NY 11366
> On Oct 29, 2019, at 7:38 PM, scott Ford wrote:
>
> Yep, looking at the z/os xl c/c++ manuals there are
There the Titles and Author are listed 50 at a time. They are non-click-able
but scroll down and the Titles and phrase containing the search string are
visible. These are click-able and puts you in the Listserv hierarchy of message
or author.
In a message dated 10/29/2019 6:41:18 PM
Dr. Merrill had the best roll-up I've seen, but don't remember which member it
was. Maybe ANALDASD.
In a message dated 10/29/2019 9:46:22 PM Central Standard Time,
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl writes:
Regarding DCOLLECT - I have no idea. :-)
Hi
Is there a WTO module which can write a message (highlight message) on a
console based on the JCL previous condition code?
We do not a product to do it and just curious if there is a one in CBTTAPE.?
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN
Joe,
You should know the answer to your question because it is clearly
documented that you can
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ceeam00/piniint.htm.
This thread has been meandering on a bit. Why don't you just copy the
example from the book which
http://planetmvs.com/freeware/dampf08.txt
WTO from exit.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieab600/iea3b6_Determining_equivalent_JCL.htm
//STEPWTO EXEC PGM=WTO,COND=(0,EQ),PARM='JOB RC NON ZERO'
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:23 PM Peter wrote:
>
> Hi
>
The message displayed by WTO just comes up but i want it to br displayed as
a RED colour message with outstanding message number to suppress by
operator.
On Wed, 30 Oct, 2019, 8:47 AM Mike Schwab, wrote:
> http://planetmvs.com/freeware/dampf08.txt
> WTO from exit.
>
>
>
43 matches
Mail list logo
