Scott,
I had to install it for ZOWE
https://docs.zowe.org/stable/user-guide/install-nodejs-zos.html
Alexander
-- Original Message --
From: "scott Ford"
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 24/03/2020 18:42:42
Subject: Nodejs
All:
Has anyone used Nodejs on Unix system Services and
Very interesting product, thanks for the link.
One disadvantage I can see -- You give up multiple-monitor capabilities (anyway
I did not see anything at that link that indicated that multiple monitors were
supported). With my cabled setup I have multiple monitor support for both
connected
Really? You violate interface requirements and then worry about problems
that ensue?
You are supposed to issue SYSSTATE AMODE64=YES to indicate that you are
AMODE 64 if invoking z/OS macros. Period. Is this new news to anyone? It
has been this way ever since AMODE64 was supported in any
On 2020-03-21 11:45 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
o Symbols EXPOSEd from external scopes can't be used as targets
of ITERATE and LEAVE. (I eschew GOTO; SIGNAL is worse,)
If you eschew goto how do you deal with error handling and cleanup using
a language which
doesn't support exceptions,
On 3/23/2020 2:15 AM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
I think I've run into an interesting problem with ESTAEX
when it is invoked in AMODE 64 without SYSTATE AMODE=64
set at assembly time.
That is, this is code that could potentially run in either AMODE 31
or AMODE 64... so it's not assembled with
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:02:57 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>On 2020-03-21 11:45 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> o Symbols EXPOSEd from external scopes can't be used as targets
>> of ITERATE and LEAVE. (I eschew GOTO; SIGNAL is worse,)
>If you eschew goto how do you deal with error handling and
I would question this.
Why not post the section from the system trace table showing this?
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:15:15 -0400 Thomas David Rivers
wrote:
:>I think I've run into an interesting problem with ESTAEX
:>when it is invoked in AMODE 64 without SYSTATE AMODE=64
:>set at assembly time.
There is such a thing as overdoing GOTOs, but I agree that a blanket
never-do-it rule is counter-productive. I don't often use SIGNAL in REXX,
because I find that its structured features are adequate. But in other
languages I have argued for limited GOTO use.
In COBOL, for example, it seems
> He had a Rexx program in which he handled error conditions
> in nested CALLs, avoiding status variables, by
> SIGNAL Top_of_main_loop.
SIGNAL is not GOTO. See https colon //www.rexxla.org/Newsletter/9812safe.html
for my perspective on SIGNAL. As you can see in https colon
It's much cleaner in PL/I than in REXX; ITERATE and LEAVE use labels rather
than control variables.
FOO: DO I=1 TO N
...
ITERATE FOO
...
END
BAR: DO I=1 TO N
...
ITERATE BAR
...
END
Note that the two loops have the same control variable but the labels are
different.
(Thanks for changing the Subject:)
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:19:16 -0400, Bob Bridges wrote:
>There is such a thing as overdoing GOTOs, but I agree that a blanket
>never-do-it rule is counter-productive. I don't often use SIGNAL in REXX,
>because I find that its structured features are adequate.
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:15:15 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>I think I've run into an interesting problem with ESTAEX
>when it is invoked in AMODE 64 without SYSTATE AMODE=64
>set at assembly time.
>
What services, IBM or ISV, nowadays can *not* be invoked:
o In AMODE 64?
o With parameters
I would say that there is no such thing as overdoing GOTOs, only misusing them,
and even if you only have one GOTO misuse is bad, while there is nothing wrong
with a lot of correctly used GOTO statements. See the classic "Structured
Programming with go to Statements" by DONALD E. KNUTH at https
>From z/OS Version 2 Release 4 DFSMS Macro Instructions for Data Sets,
>SC23-6852-40: "Since none of the macros described in this document support
>invocation in 64-bit, AMODE64=YES should not be in effect when calling the
>macros described in this book."
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Radoslaw :
I say about time. I worked at Pfizer in the late 90s they had a Cray XMP
and Silicon Graphics devices both with serious horsepower using it for
molecular rsearch,
So Summit should be great for this sort of research.
Regards,
Scott
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:13 AM R.S.
wrote:
> Yes,
All:
Has anyone used Nodejs on Unix system Services and what did they use it for
?
Can I create a Node.js server on Unix system services and create a node.js
client on Windows and talk to it ?
--
*IDMWORKS *
Scott Ford
z/OS Dev.
“By elevating a friend or Collegue you elevate yourself,
How long did it take to get it up and functional?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NFS
We run it.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at
I did because I assumed it would be required... or maybe I attempted to
start it and it failed. I have it running on three LPARs. One system
programmer test LPAR, one application test LPAR and one production LPAR.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:31 PM Steve Beaver wrote:
> My biggest concern is do I
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:17:36 -0500 Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
:>On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:15:15 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
:>>I think I've run into an interesting problem with ESTAEX
:>>when it is invoked in AMODE 64 without SYSTATE AMODE=64
:>>set
We run it.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:49 PM Steve Beaver wrote:
> How many shops are running MVSNFS currently?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to
z/OSMF has workflows that may be helpful: Workflow for Installing and
Configuring the z/OS NFS Server guides the system administrator through the
process of setting up the z/OS NFS Server, information on the initial
installation see the Workflow for Migration from z/OS DFS/SMB to z/OS NFS
I got it figure out. The biggest problem I have is the sheer number of
LPAR's that I
have to install NFS on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jousma, David
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:50 PM
To:
The new Bluezone 8.1 also requires it.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:14 PM Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> Google took me right to
> https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/sdk-nodejs-compiler-zos
>
> On 3/24/20 11:42 AM, scott Ford wrote:
> > All:
> >
> > Has anyone used Nodejs on Unix system Services and
A bit off topic perhaps, but COBOL now supports the following:
EXIT PERFORM (like LEAVE)
EXIT PERFORM CYCLE (like ITERATE)
EXIT PARAGRAPH (like LEAVE but exists the current COBOL paragraph)
EXIT SECTION (like LEAVE but exists the current COBOL section)
You can even exit from a simple block,
My biggest concern is do I need to allocate the file uniquely by LPAR since I
have a log of LPARS?
TIA
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
It has been a while back but I don't recall anything being difficult. We
are only using it to present an MVS dataset prefix to the distributed world.
There are several VSAM files that need to be created and some parm
selection. We use RACF and we attached the started task to the same
owner as
We run just the NFS client, mounting open system disk on MF for application use.
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H |
How many shops are running MVSNFS currently?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On 3/24/20 11:40 AM, scott Ford wrote:
So Summit should be great for this sort of research.
Similarly, Folding@Home (think SETI) is purportedly coming in at equal
to the top seven super computers combined.
There is a big push by F@H to work on fighting COVID-19.
Link - Folding@Home Now
Google took me right to
https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/sdk-nodejs-compiler-zos
On 3/24/20 11:42 AM, scott Ford wrote:
All:
Has anyone used Nodejs on Unix system Services and what did they use it for
?
Can I create a Node.js server on Unix system services and create a node.js
client on
On 3/24/2020 11:49 AM, Steve Beaver wrote:
How many shops are running MVSNFS currently?
We are now. It used to be SMB, but IBM discontinued that... :-(
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
I saw install Jack.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:54 PM Michael Babcock
wrote:
> The new Bluezone 8.1 also requires it.
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:14 PM Jack J. Woehr wrote:
>
> > Google took me right to
> > https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/sdk-nodejs-compiler-zos
> >
> > On 3/24/20 11:42
On 3/24/2020 2:02 PM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
PC invoked? - pretty much anything. It really annoyed me that IBM trumpeted
support for 64 bit callers for many services when the hardware did all the
work.
Not true. In order for a service to officially support 64-bit callers,
IBM must assign
33 matches
Mail list logo
