Re: AOPSTART error

UID and GID was ok. I reran the aopsetup again and everything started. I had originally ran this when the files were still mounted on my service dir with the INSTALL_DIR=/service/usr/lpp/Printsrv aopsetup AOPOPER AOPADMIN Thanks -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: C macro for maximum path length?

PATH_MAX on z/OS is 1023. This is documented in lots of error messages and BPX assembler services. > On 3 Dec 2020, at 7:16 am, Charles Mills wrote: > > I have some code that compiles both under Windows Visual Studio and z/OS > XLC. > > In Windows the maximum length of a file path is

Re: C macro for maximum path length?

I believe you, but why then is the macro undefined? Why is the definition now commented out? >From (actually CEE.SCEEH.H(LIMITS)) on z/OS V2R4: /* * POSIX.1 1990 Section 2.8.5 Statement 1065 - * these macros "shall be omitted

Re: IBM z/OS Authorized Code Scanner

I have used it quite a lot in the last few months. Give me a call (Mark has my number). Rob Scott Rocket Software On 3 Dec 2020 20:59, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw <032fff1be9b4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: EXTERNAL EMAIL Has anyone any feedback on the IBM Authorised Code Scanner?

IBM z/OS Authorized Code Scanner

Has anyone any feedback on the IBM Authorised Code Scanner? https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=AN=CA pname=gpateam=897=ENUS220-225 Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw Consultant working on contract for BMC mainframe Services by RSM Partners 'Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt

Re: RBOPSW question

EXTENDED CONTROL PSW FROM THE RB LEVEL OR LINKAGE STACK LEVEL WHICH CREATED THE ESTAE EXIT AT THE TIME IT LAST INCURRED AN INTERRUPT OR 0 FOR ESTAI. OR PSW USED TO GIVE FRR CONTROL Trying to understand this Text this PSW SDWAEC2 is The from the RB which created the ESTAE I guess my PRB It says

Re: RBOPSW question

SDWAEC2 On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:56:04 -0500 Joseph Reichman wrote: :>This question is related to recovery routines :>In the case there is SDWARBAD and SDWANAME is not there :>So for example my program abended in a SVC :>So RBOPSW is somewhere in that SVC :>The rbregs should be my program

Re: RBOPSW question

I usually look in the system trace for that information. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joseph Reichman Sent: 03 December 2020 17:14 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RBOPSW question I know for sure I’m going to say something stupid but the

Re: DFDSS copydump

Check a backup tape on each server? I.E. TMS catalog or RMM equivalent. On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:15 AM Ken Bloom wrote: > > Mike > > Is there anyway to query the drive and retrieve the tape media type and block > size? > > Regards > Ken > > > Kenneth A. Bloom > Avenir Technologies Inc >

Re: Unable to ALLOC dsn without new

so... I have looked at every dsn in the logon proc SYSPROC and SYSEXEC i found two places where the 'offending' dataset is being allocated new, including the one that issues the error messages I inserted a CONTROL LIST CONLIST SYMLIST MSG and a listcat and I see no output when logging on to the

Re: RBOPSW question

>From force of habit, I normally look at the RB chain. The PRB for your program >contains the PSW and the SVRB for for the SVC contains the registers. If you >can find a copy of Jerry Ng's excellent diagnostic presentation at Share, I >suggest that you read it. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

Re: C macro for maximum path length?

Thanks @Gord, yes, I saw pathconf(). I am starting to "get" the problem. > I suspect there's a buffer overrun hazard associated with a statically > compiled > PATH_MAX. Never mind the exact lack of a macro and never mind z/OS. Let's say one were to build a hypothetical program with a buffer

Re: ICH408I error during Setup and use of the zSecure Visual Server 2.4.0

Hi Kayhan, I see you received suitable answers to your questions on the IBM forum for zSecure here: https://community.ibm.com/community/user/security/communities/community-home?communitykey=44eb7c0d-9bc2-419b-9158-ad693e734065=groupdetails I would recommend anyone working with any of the

Re: DFDSS copydump

Thanks Mike Kenneth A. Blood Avenir Technologies Inc /d/b/a Visara International 203-984-2235 bl...@visara.com www.visara.com On Dec 3, 2020, at 11:24 AM, Mike Schwab wrote: Check a backup tape on each server? I.E. TMS catalog or RMM

Re: C macro for maximum path length?

On 2020-12-03 10:12 AM, Charles Mills wrote: I believe you, but why then is the macro undefined? Why is the definition now commented out? >From (actually CEE.SCEEH.H(LIMITS)) on z/OS V2R4: /* * POSIX.1 1990 Section 2.8.5 Statement 1065 - * these macros "shall be omitted on specific *

RBOPSW question

Hi This question is related to recovery routines In the case there is SDWARBAD and SDWANAME is not there So for example my program abended in a SVC So RBOPSW is somewhere in that SVC The rbregs should be my program But my question is would I have an address or could I determine from what

Re: C macro for maximum path length?

On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:49:05 -0500, Gord Tomlin wrote: >On 2020-12-03 10:12 AM, Charles Mills wrote: >> I believe you, but why then is the macro undefined? Why is the definition >> now commented out? >> I suspect there's a buffer overrun hazard associated with a statically compiled PATH_MAX.

Re: DFDSS copydump

Mike Is there anyway to query the drive and retrieve the tape media type and block size? Regards Ken Kenneth A. Bloom Avenir Technologies Inc /d/b/a Visara International 203-984-2235 bl...@visara.com www.visara.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: RBOPSW question

I know for sure I’m going to say something stupid but the PRB for my program is when the program started I’ll look at it up thanks > On Dec 3, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: > > From force of habit, I normally look at the RB chain. The PRB for your > program contains the PSW and

Re: IBM z/OS Authorized Code Scanner

I've used it quite a bit, and found a couple of problems, one of which was a doozy. It requires a pretty high level of knowledge to interpret the results, and figure out what the root problem is in some cases. zACS is something of a fuzz tester for SVCs and PCs. A full scan could be

Re: C macro for maximum path length?

That is the maximum length of a directory or file name. Add 1 and multiply by maximum directory depth (if any). On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:56 PM Charles Mills wrote: > > I see > > #define FILENAME_MAX 1024 > > in stdio.h V2R4 > > Where does that fit into this conundrum? > > Charles > > >

Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

It probably doesn't apply to this case, but if the documentation for a service says "invoke it this way" (and I don't just mean a "recommendation" or a "suggestion") and you choose to try something else that you think is equivalent, you are in unsupported territory. Do what you will; the risk

Broadcom CA prices

Having trouble with AC renewal pricing? They ask us for +200% (x3). -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: C macro for maximum path length?

I see #define FILENAME_MAX 1024 in stdio.h V2R4 Where does that fit into this conundrum? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 9:41 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Re: C macro for maximum path length?

Sorry, here is the error message. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.cs3cod0/ftp550113.htm z/OS Unix System Services specifies the maximum file name of 255 and path of 1023. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/PI70999 Rhapsody on Windows before 10 had

Re: C macro for maximum path length?

Is that a z/OS limit or an FTP limit? Reading the doc leads me to think it is an FTP limit, not a z/OS limit. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 3:26 PM To:

Re: C macro for maximum path length?

Linux allows 4K UTF-8 characters, so 16K bytes is possible. https://listserv.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1905=IBM-MAIN=R19142=0C1F3202D837335EDF- May 2019, Request For Enhancement to z/OS. 16 bit length so 64K possible, current limit for dynamic allocation at 255, defined limit of 1023.

Re: Invoking IFASMFDP utility via CALL, LINK, ATTACH ?

Supportability had definitely crossed my mind, so the clarification is both timely and appreciated. Thanks! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 8:22 PM To:

Re: Unable to ALLOC dsn without new

some thoughts. SYSDSN() use of disp MOD confirm ALIAS exists Use REXX to OUTTRAP the various TSO commands, and analyze the results in code. Regards Bruce -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: DFDSS copydump

Hello Mike, Thank you for your reply, I will check the maximum block sizes of device. Best regards, Toyokazu Kobayashi - Original Message - From: "Mike Schwab" Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2020 6:20 PM Subject: Re: DFDSS copydump What are