This seems to suggest that the dataspace name does not exist under this
memory.
Try specifying your jobname and "*" for the dataspace name. See what comes
out.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 13:23:33 +0100 Schühle, Simon
wrote:
:>Ok, LDMP is what I used until now to check the dump contents. So that's
Hi Gadi
Those aren't SYSOPTS options. You need to code it something like this.
CPYSEQ PROCESS-
SNODE=RTST
COPY1 COPY-
FROM (DSN=G120NTN.KVTNKSP.UNLOAD-
DISP=SHR
The DSPLIST indicated
* One entry (based on the length)
* Jobname of "*"
* Dataspace name of 1EDB
The SDUMP requested only the current ASID.
I'd guess that the system will only try to dump data spaces owned by ASID's
that are being dumped (or a data space that is SCOPE=COMMON,
Billy,
as Sri said there's no way to ask SORT tools to put a different TS on every
record.
Hereby a "try" to start with an arbitrary TS (in TOD format to generate as
you like) and then generate a number of consecutive TS part (HHMMSSuu)
with a distance of 1 us.
It's a two steps and probably
What is displayed by this IPCS command for your dump?
CBF RTCT
Jim Mulder
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Schühle, Simon
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 8:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Data space dump with SDUMPX
So, just some
Well, this does result in none of the data spaces I am looking for
showing up in the dump.
Many others show up, so I suspect that the limit for the amount of
dumped data spaces was reached before.
But also, when using the DUMP command, the correct data space is
included in the dump.
Wouldn't
This would work great if IBM hadn't also changed some control block offsets ☹
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
System Z Enthusiasts Discord:
https://discord.gg/system-z-enthusiasts-880322471608344597
“Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what
Hank - great point. This is great but the LMAC tool was dynamic and didn't
require exiting Edit/View to return to pick up the new table.
Cheers
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
System Z Enthusiasts Discord:
https://discord.gg/system-z-enthusiasts-880322471608344597
“Worry
So, just some additional details.
My DUMP Command would look like this:
DUMP COMM=(DSPTST),DSPNAME=('*'.1EDB),SDATA=(SUM,CSA,RGN),END
Compared to the SDUMPX code I posted earlier, it's basically the same.
But with DUMP I get the following result in the dump:
ASID(X'0092') DSPNAME(1EDB)
Hi,
I tried that but it didn't work.
The manual says that the SMS parameters must be specified in the SYSOPTS.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Rasmussen, A. (Andre)
Sent: יום ה 01 פברואר 2024 11:34
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Hi
It works on my end. The only difference is I have a generic process and then I
pass the parameters to via my DMBATCH step in the JCL. I don't have a DATACLAS
specified but as you can see the parameters are specified directly in the TO
statement.
DMBATCH JCL:
//ST01#01 EXEC PGM=DMBATCH
Wow! I did not realize that this was still part of the system console command
documentation. Thanks!
Thanks to all that replied.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim
Mulder
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 11:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Food for thought. You might investigate using the ADRDSSU exit
available to C:D.
Not only does it allow specifying target dataset(s) SMS classes, it
even allows copying whole volumes or dsname-masked groups of files
between z/OS systems.
Michael
At 07:50 AM 1/31/2024, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
What (if any) is the difference between the STSI instruction and the
SYSEVENT QVS service, other than maybe the C interface?
Thanks,
Joe
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Doing this regularly, my biggest problem is that a set of jobs running ISPF
in batch, all with //ISPPROF set to a temporary dataset fall over, because
it's in use. Adding a second or so delay between submitting them solves the
issue, most of the time.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, 19:15 Charles Mills,
Hi Michael,
M cuu,VOL=(SL,volser),USE=STORAGE (or PUBLIC, PRIVATE)
Regards,
David
On 2024-02-01 11:42, Michael Watkins wrote:
Before MVS/XA and RAID DASD, offline DASD volumes (e.g. 3330, 3350 & 3380
units) had to be mounted instead of simply being varied online. The mount command
used the
I am not a sysprog but I occasionally play one in my spare time. I am thinking
of changing a system that I control to DUPL_JOB=NODELAY. Any gotchas? Anything
I need to consider before I do this? Do most/many of you run with NO_DELAY?
I am trying to solve a problem where I have jobs delayed
Before MVS/XA and RAID DASD, offline DASD volumes (e.g. 3330, 3350 & 3380
units) had to be mounted instead of simply being varied online. The mount
command used the volser of the offline DASD volume as a parameter.
Does anyone remember the format of the mount command?
Does anyone have the
M addr,VOL=(SL,volser),USE={PUBLIC|PRIVATE|STORAGE}
There are those of us who use that command frequently when building
not-current versions of MVS...
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 10:44 AM Michael Watkins <
032966e74d0f-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Before MVS/XA and RAID DASD, offline
Using the listserv web interface for the first time, so I hope this goes
through OK.
In testing the new V6.4 user-defined functions capability I have found that it
seems you cannot have a separately-compiled-and-linked user-defined function.
If you separately compile and link the function for
Thanks! Sorry if you took umbrage at 'antiquarian'; no offense intended.
Question: Was 'PRIVATE' the default value for the USE parameter?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jay
Maynard
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 10:48 AM
To:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/3.1.0?topic=reference-mount-command
Jim Mulder
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Michael Watkins
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 11:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Antiquarian Curiosity: Pre-MVS/XA Mount
Biggest issue from my perspective is if all these jobs are on Initiators
(rather than delayed in the input queue) how much are they count to block each
other with dataset contention etc. Theres a possibility for some to even get
into deadly embraces where 2 jobs lock each other out and can
You only get that deadly embrace with dynamic allocation.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jerry Whitteridge
Sent: Thursday,
Not quite. You could use a unit after the vary, but you needed the MOUNT
command to assign volume attributes. SMS largely made that irrelevant.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
I still use MOUNT commands on my zPDT z/OS 3.1 system to bring new volumes
online, in flight.
It would be similarly used, I think, if new DASD was made available on any
system.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Michael Watkins
And poorly designed applications that dynamically
request the same resources exclusively, but in a
different order in various separate instances.
Michael
At 01:46 PM 2/1/2024, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64You only get
that deadly embrace with dynamic allocation.
It's still relevant if you're not using SMS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Willy Jensen
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024
Still relevant for all non-SMS volumes.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 4:42 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> It's still relevant if you're not using SMS.
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
> נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
>
>
Seems that the VATLSTxx parmlib member is still relevant.
From the z/OS 2.5 MVS Initialization and Tuning Reference:
The VATLSTxx member contains an optional VATDEF statement followed by entries
that define the mount
and use attributes of DASD volumes.
Use the VATDEF statement in VATLSTxx to
30 matches
Mail list logo
