>As you mentioned,it is important that the work that newly arrives into the
>system is properly classified and has not overly aggressive goals. However,
>it is equally important that the other "important" is correctly classified
>with a goal that is aggressive enough to protect against other w
Thanks Horst,
These are very helpful comments.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Horst Sinram wrote:
> Hi Kirk,
>
> my initial assumption would be that the "spike" effect they're seeing is
> not specific to the fact that OMVS initiators are
Hi Kirk,
my initial assumption would be that the "spike" effect they're seeing is not
specific to the fact that OMVS initiators are being used.
As you mentioned,it is important that the work that newly arrives into the
system is properly classified and has not overly aggressive goals. However,
I'm not a WLM expert, but I do understand the basics and how it works with
forked OMVS (BPXAS initiator pooled) address spaces.
First: this redbook says that it was updated in 2010, but I don't see
evidence of that in the actual PDF which still says (sic) "*Forth Edition
(March 2008)" *
http://www
