Hello,
I'm starting to try to use VMRM to handle meeting our business goals.
I'm trying to;
1) Prioritizing workloads/guests; most-loved, not as much, least ,
and bottom-feeders
2) setting VMRM's config file to match this above list.
Hoping that the highest will get as much as it needs (within
The POPS For System z contains the following note:
Programming Note: For fixed-field-length operations with field lengths that
are a power of 2, significant performance degradation is possible when
storage operands are not positioned at addresses that are integral multiples
of the operand
Hi James,
I just went through this exercise along with actually talking to one of the
original developers of VMRM. After much testing I found as you are finding that
VMRM in terms of being a Workload Manager does not quite cut it. I too wanted
to use it as a way to control the importance of
Having a lot of experience with WLM on z/OS this is a must moving forward and I
expressed that to IBM. Actually it even goes further than just z/VM at some
point being able to control the priorities of the individual z/Linux processes
would be great.
Going further, a real workload manager
You might try this:
http://portal.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=29651type=pdf
The above, Mimic: A Fast System/370 Simulator, is also cited in patent
application 5,751,982.
http://www.google.com/patents?
hl=enlr=vid=USPAT5751982id=6jAlEBAJoi=f
nddq=related:P7ZYcQqpZikJ:s
Yes, I agree. Now getting there is the challenge!
Terry
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of David Boyes
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 2:41 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Using VMRM
Having a lot of experience with WLM on
On Thursday, 01/07/2010 at 02:58 EST, Brian Nielsen
bniel...@sco.idaho.gov wrote:
You might try this:
http://portal.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=29651type=pdf
The above, Mimic: A Fast System/370 Simulator, is also cited in patent
Not everyone has access to ACM's digital library, but the only
