Phil Karn writes:
> By the way, ingress filtering breaks things other than Mobile IP.
> Consider the DirecPC service, which gives you a one-way (forward)
> satellite channel at 400 kb/s. Your return link is via local dialup
> service provider. If the local ISP (or its upstream provider) does
> sou
At 02:20 17-02-00 , Phil Karn wrote:
>It's not because fixed addresses actually cost them more. Indeed,
>another cable modem provider in the other part of town allocates fixed
>addresses in an otherwise identical service that's $5/mo cheaper. No,
>my provider does it simply because they can. They
At 21:22 15-02-00 , Tim Salo wrote:
>The original poster may, in a very real sense, actually be representing a
>company, whether the IETF wants to believe it or not.
>
>Of course, that leads to the rather interesting dilemma that we don't know
>whether an individual is speaking on behalf or his or
At 03:37 15-02-00 , Vernon Schryver wrote:
>Could Civil Service employees find it hard to get travel requests approved
>for attending meetings of an outfit that gets carried away in its rules
>and regulations on who can talk to whom?
No. Been there, done that. Lots of pain being part of the US
I'm uncomfortable with the tone of some of the responses on
this thread. I don't think there is a need for anyone to
be adversarial about this issue.
Steve Kent's point that we in the Internet community need to work
on other better mechanisms besides RPF checks is well taken.
It is also the ca
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Steven M. Bell
ovin" typed:
>>Right. Yahoo, though, was flooded mostly by the volume. I worry about
>>high-volume TCP garbage sent to port 80, which you can't filter.
Steve
so in the case that the server resource is overloaded, but not the
link, what you
