Eliot;
I would accept your interpretation if you can go to a major search engine,
like Yahoo or Altavista, and find me in a brief period of time ANY version
of Mike O'Dell's 8+8 proposal.
You should really check archive of a big internet mailing list (does
someone know where it is archived?)
At 09:42 26/09/2000 -0700, Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
At 4:09 AM +0200 9/24/00, Fred Baker wrote:
A VPN is, by my definition, any case where one overlays the global
Internet with another private Internet using tunneling. Tunneling
procedures today include MPLS, IPSEC, IP/IP, GRE/IP, and
Grenville,
I don't mind that you don't find anything valid in my little bit of our
exchange, that was the point -- WGs, IESG, inexpiry, etc., aren't the
exhaustive sources of "validity".
Incidently, the "isn't revised, and falls into the expired (and hence
not-valid) state" applies to both the
Link to article below:
http://www.thestreet.com/comment/herbonthestreet/1096812.html
Commentary: Herb on TheStreet.com
Why So Much Smart Money Is So High on Read-Rite
By Herb Greenberg
Senior Columnist
9/26/00
John,
Let's assume that Mike O'Dell never submits his idea as an RFC. What then?
It's not just Mike O'Dell who loses. Perhaps he doesn't lose at all, since
he'll be able to reproduce what he wrote from his personal archives. So
while you may argue what's morally correct (and others might
