On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Peter Deutsch wrote:
> Errr, actually carriers don't have 16" guns, the battleships did. There
Arizona had (has?) 14" ones. At least, when I visited
Pearl Harbor a couple of years ago
Anyway, will this proposed protocol also apply to
STD carries over V* cannal ? :-)
Lloyd Wood wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Lloyd Wood wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:33:25 -0700
> > > From: Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: Lloyd Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: RE: Carrier Class Gateway
> > >
> > > > T
"Willis, Scott L" wrote:
>
> Why Waste time with calculations, It's an American Ship! Swing the 16" guns
> and blow the Bridge. Bush can call it routine and not apologize for it.
Errr, actually carriers don't have 16" guns, the battleships did. There
*were* smaller caliber turrents on the old
Bill wrote:
>
> semantically confused. why would sailors be on the
> bridge? (the one over the canal)
>
I guess you know the English expression
"the best horseman is always on his feet".
The literal translation of its Dutch equivalent is:
"the best helmsmen are ashore" ...
Leen.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Steven M. Be
llovin" typed:
>>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Manning writes:
>>> semantically confused. why would sailors be on the
>>> bridge? (the one over the canal)
>>Right -- they should be using routers, not bridges.
but there's only 7 seas
