hello!
I need codes about "Formal Authentication Model of Security Protocol Based on
Intruder "
who know or have them?some matrials also is important for me!
I am so nervous to programme these,wish to modify some codes to finish my
tasks,
Thank you a lot!
please contract with me!
Once again, an IETF meeting comes at the same time as Chanuka.
Our wonderful staff have arranged for a room for candlelighting.
Sunset in Salt Lake City is shortly after 5pm so the
Brighton room at the Grand America will be set aside for candlelighting
from 5:45 until 10pm.
I will be bringing
Seems to me this is a case where "put up or shut up" might apply - we can
test this theory without any centralized action at all.
I *think* the matter of making 2 lists (or 3, or 4, or...) can be done in
about 1 hour using Procmail and Mailman on an Unix box: subscribe once to
the ietf-announce l
At 09:29 AM 11/19/2001 +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>Andy,
>
>I don't see how this will help. The nonsense messages will still come,
>from the usual sources, often copied to both lists, which will only
>increase the level of annoyance.
IETF Last Call is a critical part of the Standards Proces
Who is going to follow the code of conduct ? People who are breaking the
code now !!! ???
I am trying to understand the intent of splitting.
> -Original Message-
> From: GVSN Naik [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:52 PM
> To: Brian E Carpenter; Andy Bierman
>
That would sacrifice one of the very basic principles of the
IETF - free access for anyone. Let's not go there.
Brian
Pankaj Bhandari wrote:
>
> Brian,
>
> Certainly, I agree.
>
> As a long term solution we can stop free-subscription to IETF and
> subscription-by-payment be there for whoso
Andy and Brian,Splitting IESG surely will decrease the
traffic per List, but one should aware which List handles what along with code
of conduct for each List.thanksNaik GVSNMember of DCM
Technologies Ltd.,125, Udyog Vihar, Phase #5, Gurgaon 122001 INDIAPBX:
91-124-6439224 FAX: 91-124-643923
Brian,
Certainly, I agree.
As a long term solution we can stop free-subscription to IETF and
subscription-by-payment be there for whosoever wishes to have access.
The charges can be made nominal. This way atleast we can have some check
on the unscrupulous elements sending mails to the list.
-
Andy,
I don't see how this will help. The nonsense messages will still come,
from the usual sources, often copied to both lists, which will only
increase the level of annoyance.
[Splitting the -announce list doesn't have this disadvantage.]
Brian
Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would li
