Yes, I'm planning to check that in AUTH48 and wordsmith it as necessary.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2011-07-06 14:22, C. M. Heard wrote:
Greetings,
I note that draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory-02, now approved for
publication and in the RFC Editor's queue, has a minor dependency on
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05
Rolf
Thank you for the review
On 19/05/2011 14:24, Rolf Winter wrote:
CONTENT:
Section 3 says:
If a flow LSE is present, it MUST be checked to determine whether it
carries a reserved label. If it is a reserved label the packet is
processed according to the rules associated with that
Just remember kids,
disagreeing is not attacking. accusing them of attacking when all
they're doing is disagreeing is an attack on them.
don't assume people have no real world experience or responsibilities if
they choose not to announce to the world their job title or their
affiliations in
Hi Kathleen and Matthew,
Thank you for your review and comment. I have updated the draft according to
most of your comments.
-Original Message-
From: kathleen.moria...@emc.com [mailto:kathleen.moria...@emc.com]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:09 PM
To: gen-...@ietf.org;
Lihongyu(Hongyu) would like to recall the message, GEN-ART review for
draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon-03 .
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
The pain point is really the unnecessarily aggressive kill what we
don't like move-to-historic action.
if we killed everything i do not like, there would be lot fewer rfcs. :)
what people are saying is kill it because it is broken, bad, and does a
dis-service to ipv6.
randy
Hi Kathleen and Matthew,
Thank you for your review and comments. I have updated the draft according to
most of your comments. I don't think it is right to talk about VCCV or
complicated OAM mechanism in current draft. Probably there could be a new draft
talking about this in the future. As for
Dear all,
I have the following comments:
Sect 7: A maintenance point is either a Maintenance
Entity Group End-point (MEP) or a Maintenance Entity Group
Intermediate Point (MIP). Maintenance points are uniquely associated
with a MEG.
This is true for MEP. MIP, as currently defined, are not
Hi Rui:
The comments were not ignored, the resolution of the Q10 comments as well as
those collected from the MPLS WG was presented at the last IETF. My spreadsheet
from which that report was generated and has been augmented to include the BFD
WG comments is available at
Has anyone found a particularly good solution to reading drafts on an ipad?
What about markup and notes on drafts?
Thanks, Cullen
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On Wed Jul 6 16:38:47 2011, Cullen Jennings wrote:
Has anyone found a particularly good solution to reading drafts on
an ipad? What about markup and notes on drafts?
Print them out using your ASR-33, then stick them on top.
HTH,
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:d...@cridland.net -
All,
Since someone has commented about the process used for resolving
questions on
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi I am supplying some details below.
The history of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi working group review
process is:
On February 3rd 2011 the working group last call was issued
on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/6/11 5:38 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
Has anyone found a particularly good solution to reading drafts on
an ipad? What about markup and notes on drafts?
I use GoodReader
Klaas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14
On Jul 5, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
what people are saying is kill it because it is broken, bad, and does a
dis-service to ipv6.
Actually, I seem to have been the only person who proposed killing it-- the
rest of you seem to have settled on merely looking at it crossly and hoping
On 7/6/2011 8:38 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
Has anyone found a particularly good solution to reading drafts on an ipad?
What about markup and notes on drafts?
Text files are easily modified by any text editor.
What specific issues present a challenge for you on a tablet?
(I use an Android
On Jun 12, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
What I propose is that I submit the documents with the fixes that were
carried out, and the IESG restart the Last Call process.
Tom, glad was caught this before this was an RFC. I think your proposal sounds
like the right way to proceed.
A few things apply, depending on how you fetch the drafts and what you
want to do.
- From some other machine, sync them into Dropbox and read and edit
them straight from Dropbox on the iPad using Plaintext (set its
directory to / which gives you all of the Dropbox directory,
otherwise it just
On 07/06/2011 09:45, james woodyatt wrote:
Actually, I seem to have been the only person who proposed killing it-- the
rest of you seem to have settled on merely looking at it crossly and hoping it
will wither away in shame.
... as well it should. :)
Meanwhile I have stated several times
Doug Barton wrote:
Meanwhile I have stated several times that I'd like it to be gone,
completely, yesterday. I was however willing to accept historic as a
reasonable compromise.
historic as a compromise? Between which two positions?
-Martin
On 07/06/2011 13:14, Martin Rex wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Meanwhile I have stated several times that I'd like it to be gone,
completely, yesterday. I was however willing to accept historic as a
reasonable compromise.
historic as a compromise? Between which two positions?
Nuking it from
Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/06/2011 13:14, Martin Rex wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
I was however willing to accept historic as a reasonable compromise.
historic as a compromise? Between which two positions?
Nuking it from orbit, and erecting a statue in its honor?
Which to options
On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 04:49:47 PM Martin Rex wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/06/2011 13:14, Martin Rex wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
I was however willing to accept historic as a reasonable
compromise.
historic as a compromise? Between which two positions?
Nuking it
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 04:49:47 PM Martin Rex wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/06/2011 13:14, Martin Rex wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
I was however willing to accept historic as a reasonable
compromise.
historic as a compromise? Between which
On 7/6/2011 10:38 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
Has anyone found a particularly good solution to reading drafts on an ipad?
What about markup and notes on drafts?
The iPad is a porn toy; get a real computer.
...
attachment: gwz.vcf___
Ietf mailing
The IESG has received a request from the Operations and Management Area
Working Group WG (opsawg) to consider the following document:
- 'An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)
Mechanisms'
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-05.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans
The IESG has received a request from the Diameter Maintenance and
Extensions WG (dime) to consider the following document:
- 'Diameter Priority Attribute Value Pairs'
draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-04.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
This is a reminder that the Internet Draft Final Submission Cut-off Date
is approaching.
The Internet Draft final submission (version -01 and up) cut-off is
Monday, July 11, 2011 at 17:00 PT (00:00 UTC).
All drafts can be uploaded using the ID submission tool located here:
The IESG has received a request from the Decoupled Application Data
Enroute WG (decade) to consider the following document:
- 'A Survey of In-network Storage Systems'
draft-ietf-decade-survey-04.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
29 matches
Mail list logo
