Re: [hybi] Last Call: (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard

2011-07-20 Thread Mykyta Yevstifeyev
I support the opinion that SRV mechanism for use with WebSocket should be incorporated in the core WS specification. Mykyta 19.07.2011 16:26, Dave Cridland wrote: On Tue Jul 19 12:51:16 2011, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2011/7/11 The IESG : > The IESG has received a request from the BiDirection

Secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-04

2011-07-20 Thread Stephen Hanna
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like

RE: Standards

2011-07-20 Thread Worley, Dale R (Dale)
> From: John C Klensin [john-i...@jck.com] > > If "sweep away" is something that occurs after many years of > competing standards and a long period of time in which the > outcome was not clear, then sure. Yes. In the sense that over the long run, the number of "standards" that are commonly imple

RE: Standards

2011-07-20 Thread John C Klensin
--On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:54 -0400 "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" wrote: >> From: Yoav Nir [y...@checkpoint.com] >> >> Very appropriate for XKCD to post this just a few days before >> an IETF meeting. >> >> http://www.xkcd.com/927/ > > And yet sometimes a standard will sweep away everything

Re: Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10

2011-07-20 Thread Alexey Melnikov
Hi Richard, Thanks for the review. I will answer to some of your comments and I or my co-editor will followup on remaining issues later on. Richard L. Barnes wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

RE: Standards

2011-07-20 Thread Worley, Dale R (Dale)
> From: Yoav Nir [y...@checkpoint.com] > > Very appropriate for XKCD to post this just a few days before an IETF > meeting. > > http://www.xkcd.com/927/ And yet sometimes a standard will sweep away everything that was before it. One remarkably successful case is "ASCII" (containing the 26 lette

Re: Another look at 6to4 (and other IPv6 transition issues)

2011-07-20 Thread Keith Moore
yes, but if I'm not mistaken, you already had RIPv2 then. Keith On Jul 19, 2011, at 7:38 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > After all, we moved RIPv1 to Historic when it was still widely implemented, > and used in many networks. > Yours, > Joel > > On 7/19/2011 5:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 07/1

Re: Standards

2011-07-20 Thread Yoav Nir
[Helmet on] Maybe they should first move the 14 competing standards to Historic. On 7/20/11 10:17 AM, "Bert (IETF) Wijnen" wrote: >I LOVE this one. > >Bert > >On 7/20/11 8:23 AM, Yoav Nir wrote: >> Hi >> >> Very appropriate for XKCD to post this just a few days before an IETF >> meeting. >> >>

Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages

2011-07-20 Thread Harald Alvestrand
On 07/20/11 09:22, Nathaniel Borenstein wrote: Except that the other Content-disposition values express the sender's intent, whereas this one expresses the receiver's [likely] perception. In this case, we have to invent a cute backronym for it that expresses the sender's intent what about N

Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages

2011-07-20 Thread Nathaniel Borenstein
Except that the other Content-disposition values express the sender's intent, whereas this one expresses the receiver's [likely] perception. It might as well be "Content-disposition: discard" -- no sender would ever generate it. In contrast one could make at least a semi-serious case that by d

Re: Standards

2011-07-20 Thread Bert (IETF) Wijnen
I LOVE this one. Bert On 7/20/11 8:23 AM, Yoav Nir wrote: Hi Very appropriate for XKCD to post this just a few days before an IETF meeting. http://www.xkcd.com/927/ (For those who are not familiar with XKCD, don't miss the alt-text on the picture) Yoav ___