Re: Last Call: draft-george-travel-faq-03.txt (IETF meetingattendees' Frequently Asked (travel) Questions) to Informational RFC

2012-02-08 Thread t.petch
- Original Message - From: Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: The IESG iesg-secret...@ietf.org Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 12:30 AM This is pretty good already. Some additional FAQs I'd suggest below. Feel free to take 'em or leave 'em, I'll not be

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC

2012-02-08 Thread Joel jaeggli
On 2/8/12 05:54 , Lorenzo Colitti wrote: On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 01:35, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com mailto:f...@cisco.com wrote: The IESG again decided it needed a revised draft, and that draft - in large part, a rewrite - arrived in October. v6ops had a second WGLC, in which you

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC

2012-02-08 Thread Fred Baker
What specifically would you like changed in the draft? Can you suggest text? On Feb 8, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 01:35, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote: The IESG again decided it needed a revised draft, and that draft - in large part, a rewrite -

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC

2012-02-08 Thread Lorenzo Colitti
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 01:35, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote: The IESG again decided it needed a revised draft, and that draft - in large part, a rewrite - arrived in October. v6ops had a second WGLC, in which you again declined to comment, although you may have seen Lorenzo's comments,

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6nd-problems-04.txt (Operational Neighbor Discovery Problems) to Informational RFC

2012-02-08 Thread Fernando Gont
Folks, I've reviewed the aforementioned document. These are my comments: ** Technical: ** * Section 6.1: It should be noted that the proposed mitigations makes address scans easier. Also, the text currently says and may not interact well with networks using [RFC4862]. -- I'd argue that it

RE: Last Call: draft-george-travel-faq-03.txt (IETF meetingattendees' Frequently Asked (travel) Questions) to Informational RFC

2012-02-08 Thread Ross Callon
Also useful: What levels of tips are normally expected in what circumstances (in restaurants, taxi's, etc..). Ross -Original Message- From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of t.petch Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 3:56 AM To: Stephen Farrell;

Re: Last Call: draft-george-travel-faq-03.txt (IETF meetingattendees' Frequently Asked (travel) Questions) to Informational RFC

2012-02-08 Thread Randy Bush
perhaps this document should not attempt to duplicate Rough Guide or Lonely Planet? randy ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

RE: Last Call: draft-george-travel-faq-03.txt (IETF meetingattendees' Frequently Asked (travel) Questions) to Informational RFC

2012-02-08 Thread Adrian Farrel
I find Fodor far more pleasant for its antiquated interests. Michelin is OK if you like your culture graded through a French filter. Hang on! Shouldn't we also have a Trip advisor style points count? perhaps this document should not attempt to duplicate Rough Guide or Lonely Planet? randy

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt (Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6) to Informational RFC

2012-02-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message cakd1yr2xgkeek7sarjmzsbdjps0u5ftozo0qa5ma4fda+sb...@mail.gmail.com, Lorenzo Colitti writes: On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 01:35, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote: The IESG again decided it needed a revised draft, and that draft - in large part, a rewrite - arrived in October. v6ops had

Re: ITC copped out on UTC again

2012-02-08 Thread Steven Bellovin
On Feb 7, 2012, at 2:12 59PM, John C Klensin wrote: --On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:45 -0800 james woodyatt j...@apple.com wrote: ... TAI has a fairly stable foundation in non-relativistic physics, which experience has shown to be somewhat resistant to the power of political

Re: ITC copped out on UTC again

2012-02-08 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2012-02-09 10:41, Steven Bellovin wrote: On Feb 7, 2012, at 2:12 59PM, John C Klensin wrote: --On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:45 -0800 james woodyatt j...@apple.com wrote: ... TAI has a fairly stable foundation in non-relativistic physics, which experience has shown to be somewhat

RE: Last Call: draft-george-travel-faq-03.txt (IETF meetingattendees' Frequently Asked (travel) Questions) to Informational RFC

2012-02-08 Thread Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
Hi, One more question for either Section 3.1 (or Security Considerations ;-)) How much time does Airport check-in take including getting through the security lines? How much time before take-off should one plan on leaving the hotel/site? Best regards, Yaacov Weingarten Nokia Siemens Networks

IAB statement: The interpretation of rules in the ICANN gTLD Applicant Guidebook

2012-02-08 Thread IAB Chair
The IAB has issued a statement entitled The interpretation of rules in the ICANN gTLD Applicant Guidebook. The statement is available here: http://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2012-2/iab-sta tement-the-interpretation-of-rules-in-the-icann-gtld-applicant-guidebook/