Well, is that a meta-judgment call?
I took the view that the full process expressed in draft-farrell-ft could not be
done by the IESG at their discretion. That is, that some of the steps proposed
constituted a significant variation from documented processes or
well-established behavior. Thus, it
I believe that Adrian did right in this case. This was IMO one of the
situations which in Spencer's language was 'middle path between lightweight
IESG decisions and full process BCP revisions' and a 3933 experiment could have
proved it right or wrong, useful or not. The community could not
Hi Adrian,
At 01:15 30-01-2013, Adrian Farrel wrote:
I do not take quite the same negative view as Stephen, but I do agree with
Spencer that getting consensus for a process change always looks like a
formidable task. Small changes never address enough of the problem
or the right
piece of the
On 1/30/2013 1:15 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
I do agree with
Spencer that getting consensus for a process change always looks like a
formidable task. Small changes never address enough of the problem or the right
piece of the problem. Large changes are too much in one go. :-) So, it seems to
At 14:30 16-01-2013, IAB Chair wrote:
This is an announcement of an IETF-wide Call for Comment on 'Privacy
Considerations for Internet Protocols'.
The document is being considered for publication as an Informational
RFC within the IAB stream, and is available for inspection here:
This is a note about two ongoing Call for Comments that may interest
participants on this list. Comments on these documents can be sent to
i...@iab.org or entered in TRAC.
1. Privacy Considerations for
Internet Protocols. This Call for Comment ends on February 18, 2013.
The document is
The IMAP MOVE extension (imapmove) working group in the Applications
Area has concluded. The IESG contact persons are Barry Leiba and Pete
Resnick.
With the publication of RFC 6851 and the recording of implementation
data on the working group wiki, the work of the imapmove working group
is
The IESG has approved the following document:
- '464XLAT: Combination of Stateful and Stateless Translation'
(draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-09.txt) as Best Current Practice
This document is the product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Ronald Bonica and Benoit
