;s position papers claim that
alternate Nexus implementations will be legal. Will users be
able to enable different Nexus implementations to
interoperate and share keys for sealed storage?
Caitlin Bestler
http://asomi.com/CaitlinBestler/
stly came up
with arguments on why XML-RPC would be better *instead
of* SOAP. Are there valid arguments on why it is a
valuable tool *in addition to* SOAP?
Caitlin Bestler
http://asomi.com/CaitlinBestler/
On 9/26/02, Lloyd Wood wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>
>>
>> So, as originally proposed an IP fragment is a fully
>> self-routed L3 datagram.
>
>well, not self-routed; you need routing state. I don't
>think the difference between rou
On 9/26/02, Lloyd Wood wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Fred Baker wrote:
>
>> At 01:12 PM 9/25/2002 +0100, Lloyd Wood wrote:
>> >A datagram is self-describing; full source and
>> >destination. A fragment (IPv4 fragment) may not be.
>>
>> you sure? take a GOOD look at RFC 791... It is
>> completely s
On 7/23/02, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>
>While these "blow by blow" accounts give the appearance of
>great detail, I think they are seldom sufficiently
>accurate or complete enough to support using them to
>discern "motivations and other nuances." YMMV.
>
>A few years ago the minute taker for one WG
On 7/23/02, Vernon Schryver wrote:
>> From: Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> > How does one tell, in principle, that the source IP
>> > address (ar$spa) in an ARP packet is in fact spoofed?
>>
>> Not without cryptographic authentication, in general.
>>
>> But for this particular issue, not up
is similar to many protocols above layer 4 that run
over multiple transports, including RPC and SNMP.
Caitlin Bestler
Asomi Network Technologies
>
> > IPv6 needs to be justified on the number of nodes that truly need a
> > globally accessible public address, not by insisting on counting devices
> > that should remain anonymous or under limited (and controlled) visibility.
>
> you appear to be confusing visibility with accessibility.
>
> > 3) new devices that plug into residential networks (mostly new)
> >
> > What stops the new devices from having v4 with NAT to translate between the
> > internet and the house.
>
> nothing stops them, but if you want to access the devices from outside the
> house (and in many cases that's the
