On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Mary Barnes mary.h.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
I did have some annoyances with the housekeeping, in particular the
rewashing of glasses/mugs in the bathroom sink and someone else's soap bar
ending up in my bathroom.
Can I have my soap back?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Toerless Eckert eck...@cisco.com wrote:
PS.: I just spent a day at CeBIT. One guy there reported to that he has
seen 35000 active devices on his WiFi snooper.
I'm not quite sure what that means, but he seemed to be implying at a
specific point in time.
Go
City of Celebration - it's more than just a movie set. Freakiest place on earth.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
Going Beyond Disney in Orlando
Quick, name five reasons to go to Orlando. Here are mine: Puerto Rican
delicacies, alternative
2008/3/9 Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Its a bootstrap problem though. You have to establish the market conditions
to favor multicast deployment.
True, which is why I believe the IETF stopped short of producing a
complete set of tools to overcome the end-to-end dependency of
2008/3/8 Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Patrik Fältström wrote:
[..]
I am afraid that this is the sort of reasoning that has lead to P2P
having such widespread use.
I fully agree, (unicast) P2P is a godsend for Transit operators.
The fun with p2p is though, that HTTP is also peer
On Feb 1, 2008 12:18 AM, Pekka Savola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Dean Willis wrote:
And no, I don't play golf, which appears to be the entire focus of
this sort of location.
This could be an opportunity to do something different. (Though I
agree that having the IETF on
On Dec 16, 2007 3:17 PM, Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007, Fred Baker wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007, at 2:17 AM, Jeyasekar Antony wrote:
I heard that TCP is not suitable for high speed network because of its
is it true? is there any research work going on in this
the right certificates and authorizations. This
seems to still be the problem with the Mac.
Marshall
Greg Shepherd wrote:
Why? Poor client support springs to mind. I've always wanted to
have someone throw together a web page that downloads a Java applet
equivalent to vic/vat/rat/etc
