Is there any planned ad-hoc meeting/session related to this topic in
Hiroshima meeting?
Peny
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote:
Thanks. You already know this, as does Russ Housley, but I'll say it out
loud for others to hear.
At the third NIST workshop on the
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Randall Gellens ra...@qualcomm.com wrote:
At 5:45 PM +0800 9/21/09, Peny Yang wrote:
However, IMHO, your
experience may be the story 10 years ago. I am a smoker. When I would
like to smoke, I always go find the smoking corner.
Now, in Beijing, smoking
Just try to clarify somethings here, check inline please:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Randall Gellens ra...@qualcomm.com wrote:
Personally, I have three specific concerns with a meeting in China:
(1) The law and associated hotel rule Marshall quoted could be violated by
what may appear
] On Behalf Of
Peny Yang
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 17:18
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: IPsecme WG
Subject: [IPsec] Fwd: Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption
(IKEv2 Session Resumption) to Proposed Standard
Sorry, I should cc IPsec mail list. Comments are sent again.
Hi, floks:
I
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Tero Kivinenkivi...@iki.fi wrote:
Yaron Sheffer writes:
[YS] I see the merits of extending IKE_SA_INIT to support resumption, and in
fact an early version of our work did exactly that. But the working group
gave us a clear direction to use a separate exchange,
Hi, floks:
I have two comments on the draft of IKEv2 Session Resumption:
1) Sorry, I have to talk about my concern on the new
IKE_SESSION_RESUME. In WG last call, actually I made this comment.
However, no feedback was given, maybe because my comment was a little
late for WG last call. So, I just
