- Original Message -
From: Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: IETF discussion list ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 4:31 PM
I find the security considerations in this registration rather weak.
What might have sufficed in 2005 seems to
I find the security considerations in this registration rather weak.
What might have sufficed in 2005 seems to me inadequate for 2013. I
would expect a clearer statement of what are or are not considered
threats or attacks and what mitigations there then are for them.
Tom Petch
- Original
- Original Message -
From: Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
To: Noel Chiappa j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 8:38 PM
On 11/10/2013 07:52, Noel Chiappa wrote:
From: Arturo Servin arturo.ser...@gmail.com
Then we have a
A minor point inline, rest snipped
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Pete Resnick presn...@qti.qualcomm.com
To: dcroc...@bbiw.net
Cc: IETF Discussion ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:48 PM
Finally back to this original review.
On 10/6/13 7:03 PM, Dave Crocker
I think that this I-D is flawed and should not become an RFC. It has
several implicit presumptions that I think wrong.
1) It does not state its target audience until, perhaps, the reference
in the Conclusions, to WG Chairs. It makes no mention of the consensus
calls made by ADs, such as at IETF
Original Message -
From: Richard Barnes r...@ipv.sx
To: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 6:14 PM
It also makes it obvious to everyone that Peter is using PGP. Which
serves
a pedagogical function, I guess. :)
It also means I can
It is a shame that this opportunity was not taken to highlight the need
for authentication. Having a totally secure channel with perfect
encryption is of little value if the other end of the channel is a
hostile power.
RFC3365, which you cite, gets in right (of course!). It lists three
- Original Message -
From: Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: Richard Barnes r...@ipv.sx; Peter Saint-Andre
stpe...@stpeter.im; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:03 PM
On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:41 AM, t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com wrote:
for
- Original Message -
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com
To: Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:56 AM
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Andrew Sullivan
a...@anvilwalrusden.comwrote:
On Fri,
- Original Message -
From: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Michelle Cotton'
michelle.cot...@icann.org; 'ietf' ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 4:35 PM
Original Message -
From: Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk
To: 'Michelle Cotton'
I recently saw 'deprecate' used in an IANA Considerations and turned to
IANA Considerations [RFC5226] to see how it was defined only to find
no mention of it there. I am used to the term from SMI, as quoted
below, but that seems not quite right, in that a deprecated IANA entry
never disappears,
This I-D uses the term 'deprecated' without defining it nor is the term
defined in IANA Considerations [RFC5226] (It does however already
appear in the IANA Registry).
I am familiar with the SMI definition but that seems not quite right for
this context; some of the IANA uses of this have been
Roni
I find it difficult to know whether to agree with you or not since there
is another gorilla operating in this namespace, namely
draft-andersson-mpls-lsp-ping-upd-00
which sort of gives the option of taking out the sub-TLV types of a TLV
Type into a separate registry which can then be
Original Message -
From: Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk
To: 'Michelle Cotton' michelle.cot...@icann.org; 'Dearlove,
Christopher (UK)' chris.dearl...@baesystems.com; 't.p.'
daedu...@btconnect.com; 'ietf' ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 4:13 PM
Subject: RE: Deprecate
- Original Message -
From: Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com
To: John Levine jo...@taugh.com
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 4:03 PM
On Aug 13, 2013, at 9:51 AM, John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote:
There's no great way
to send around a
Chris
I would not like to see the Trust Agreement change to accommodate issues
one or two - I think that the agreement got that one right.
Three is different. The Trust ought to be able to dispose of rights
that are not needed, never will be and are costing money. But how can
that be expressed
Original Message -
From: John R Levine jo...@taugh.com
To: Yoav Nir y...@checkpoint.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2013 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: Speaking of VAT
Ray said the tax guys told him the IETF would get back about half of
the
VAT it paid. That's unrelated to what
Dave
I think the points you make below are good, once the newcomer to the
IETF has found their working group. This is not always easy. Fine if
your interest is in OSPF, ISIS, TLS, TCPMaintenance but in other
spheres, the IETF approach of choosing a 'witty' name seems to me less
than welcoming.
Original Message -
From: Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: ietf ietf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 9:26 PM
Tom,
On 25/06/2013 22:48, t.p. wrote:
...
The main impression that this page has on me is that this is a
- Original Message -
From: IETF Administrative Director i...@ietf.org
To: IETF Announcement List ietf-annou...@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:59 PM
One of the IAOC goals for 2013 was to update the IAOC website to improve
consistency, organization, linkage, and ease of use.
I am
- Original Message -
From: Pete Resnick presn...@qti.qualcomm.com
To: Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Content-free Last Call comments
It's interesting to see that people are interpreting me to mean I want
more
- Original Message -
From: l.w...@surrey.ac.uk
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:55 PM
Subject: Renaming RFC
RFC should be renamed to Resulted From Comments. It's now the endpoint
of the process; Request For Comments dated from when it was the start.
tp
Fundamentally
Original Message -
From: Melinda Shore melinda.sh...@gmail.com
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk
Cc: dcroc...@bbiw.net; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:06 AM
On 5/29/13 10:53 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
I see a wedge :-)
The problem is where to stop.
Well, I don't know. Maybe the
- Original Message -
From: Lou Berger lber...@labn.net
To: Yoav Nir y...@checkpoint.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: IETF Meeting in South America
For Americans, is it much more expensive than a trip to Prague?
I just happen to be looking at
- Original Message -
From: Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 4:37 PM
On 5/17/2013 7:01 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
But WGs should be able to periodically summarize what they're
doing -
what problem they're trying to solve, what approach they're
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Dale R. Worley wor...@ariadne.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: Accessing tools from IETF pages
From: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
I wanted to submit an I-D so I wanted to
I wanted to submit an I-D so I wanted to access the tools, as I have
done before, so I clicked on 'IETF Tools' from
http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/
and when that failed tried again with 'Tools Team Pages' from
http://www.ietf.org/iesg/
with the same result. Can anyone else get to tools from that
- Original Message -
From: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin petit...@acm.org
Cc: Yaron Sheffer yaronf.i...@gmail.com; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 12:13 AM
On 5/2/13 4:03 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
On 05/02/2013 02:40 PM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
Original Message -
From: TZI c...@tzi.org
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im; Marc Petit-Huguenin
petit...@acm.org; Yaron Sheffer yaronf.i...@gmail.com; ietf
ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: Language editing
We really
- Original Message -
From: Ray Pelletier rpellet...@isoc.org
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk
Cc: Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com; IETF list ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 3:29 PM
On May 3, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk
wrote:
Well said, Thomas.
Two concrete
- Original Message -
From: Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net
To: IETF list ietf@ietf.org
Cc: Pete Resnick presn...@qti.qualcomm.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 4:33 PM
Subject: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
I wrote a blog article about how we do a fairly significant amount of
- Original Message -
From: Margaret Wasserman m...@lilacglade.org
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: Dan Harkins dhark...@lounge.org; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 1:53 AM
Hi Tom,
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:03 AM, t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com wrote:
If we required the IETF to
- Original Message -
From: Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net
To: Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca
Cc: Sam Hartman hartmans-i...@mit.edu; ietf@ietf.org;
stbry...@cisco.com
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 10:01 PM
On Apr 29, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
On 2013-04-29, at
- Original Message -
From: Christian Huitema huit...@microsoft.com
To: Fernando Gont fg...@si6networks.com; SM s...@resistor.net
Cc: RJ Atkinson rja.li...@gmail.com; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 6:02 PM
snip
Instead, the draft goes into great details on how to actually
Original Message -
From: Clint Chaplin clint.chap...@gmail.com
To: IETF Discussion List ietf@ietf.org
Cc: net...@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:39 PM
Why did this (and the other most recent) last call also not go to
IETF-Announce?
And I was wondering why I got four copies of
David
A thoughtful assessment, and what it brings out for me is that we do not
have an Information Model:-( That is, we could have reverse engineered
an Information Model from the IF-MIB and then produced a data model in
YANG, but that did not happen. Rather, there is a new and different
- Original Message -
From: Dan Harkins dhark...@lounge.org
To: Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 4:59 AM
On Thu, April 18, 2013 6:44 pm, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:17:21AM -0700, Dan Harkins wrote:
So a problem
- Original Message -
From: Lou Berger lber...@labn.net
To: Melinda Shore melinda.sh...@gmail.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 1:09 PM
Melinda,
I'm not so sure debating the merits of a specific measure has value or
not is really that helpful, and I probably just
- Original Message -
From: l.w...@surrey.ac.uk
To: daedu...@btconnect.com; arturo.ser...@gmail.com; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 3:46 AM
If you think security and congestion are arcane, you have... problems.
This was an actual ietf working geoup, and not some e.g. W3c
Ray
Expert as the IETF (and its allied organisations) is in Internet
Engineering, I doubt if many of those skills transfer into Social
Engineering, which is the field in which I think this question lies.
Lacking such expertise, into how to frame a question in order to get the
answer which is
- Original Message -
From: Arturo Servin arturo.ser...@gmail.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 8:28 PM
Not answering any particular post. Just a comment.
The IESG should be there to attest that the IETF procedure was
followed
and the document reached consensus in the
- Original Message -
From: Melinda Shore melinda.sh...@gmail.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:11 AM
We have the mailing list archives, we've got the document shepherd
writeups, we've got the IESG evaluation record, we've got the IESG
writeups, we've got meeting
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Casner cas...@acm.org
To: Noel Chiappa j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 3:10 PM
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Martian is nice expression.
Weren't 'unusual' packets called 'Martians' at
- Original Message -
From: S Moonesamy sm+i...@elandsys.com
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK) chris.dearl...@baesystems.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 2:13 PM
At 05:25 08-03-2013, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
You need at least two more properties
(iii) High
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com
To: Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
Cc: bra...@isi.edu; IETF-Discussion ietf@ietf.org; Dearlove,
Christopher (UK) chris.dearl...@baesystems.com; t.p.
daedu...@btconnect.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 4:12 PM
On
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK) chris.dearl...@baesystems.com
Cc: bra...@isi.edu; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 8:01 PM
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
chris.dearl...@baesystems.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: Call for Comment: RFC Format Requirements and Future
Development
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:48:53AM +0100, Martin Rex wrote:
Limiting the waste of
- Original Message -
From: Sam Hartman hartmans-i...@mit.edu
To: Mary Barnes mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com
Cc: Sam Hartman hartmans-i...@mit.edu; IETF ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 8:26 PM
Mary == Mary Barnes mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com writes:
Mary And, I continue to
- Original Message -
From: Martin Stiemerling martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: Sam Hartman hartmans-i...@mit.edu; IETF ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 11:13 AM
Hi Tom,
On 03/05/2013 11:38 AM, t.p. wrote:
- Original Message - From:
inline
- Original Message -
From: l.w...@surrey.ac.uk
To: daedu...@btconnect.com; martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu
Cc: hartmans-i...@mit.edu; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:53 PM
Ah, the 'but security, unlike transport, is actually important'
argument.
Having seen
Original Message -
From: Eggert, Lars l...@netapp.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: l.w...@surrey.ac.uk; martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu;
ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 4:18 PM
On Mar 5, 2013, at 15:10, t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com wrote:
The question is can we do with a
Jari
The day after your post I read that
The 2012-2013 IETF nomination process has not yet filled the Transport
Area Director position despite several attempts to broaden the pool of
nominees.
which to me sums it up. ADs are the critical resource, on the critical
path in project management
- Original Message -
From: John Levine jo...@taugh.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: daedu...@btconnect.com
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 7:44 PM
There should be an immutable requirement that any alternative format
MUST NOT increase the size by more than a factor of two compared to
ASCII text.
- Original Message -
From: Dale R. Worley wor...@ariadne.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: rfc-inter...@rfc-editor.org; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 7:56 PM
From: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
The result was 32kbyte, ie the
formatting used by another SDO had
- Original Message -
From: Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: i...@iab.org; rfc-inter...@rfc-editor.org; ietf ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: Call for Comment: RFC Format Requirements and Future
Development
On Mar 1,
Can anyone help an ignorant European? Given a meeting time of 12:00
Noon ET [sic] on Sunday 10th March 2013, what is that in UTC? Daylight
saving will have started by then in the USA but not in Europe so the
scope for being an hour late or an hour early is much increased.
Tom Petch
-
I think that this I-D has one hole in it but it is a massive one. It
places no limit on the size to which an alternative format could expand
our documents.
I was reminded of this when I received a 514kbyte e-mail from another
SDO on an IETF list. I saved the text and so lost the exact
- Original Message -
From: Margaret Wasserman m...@lilacglade.org
To: Pete Resnick presn...@qti.qualcomm.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:49 PM
On Feb 26, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Pete Resnick presn...@qti.qualcomm.com
wrote:
But more seriously: I agree with you both.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net
To: Sam Hartman hartmans-i...@mit.edu
Cc: Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com; ietf
ietf@ietf.org; Lixia Zhang li...@cs.ucla.edu
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 6:38 PM
On 2/3/2013 10:28 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
I'm not
Whoops, I lost a 'not'
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net
To: Sam Hartman hartmans-i...@mit.edu
Cc: Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com; ietf
ietf@ietf.org; Lixia Zhang li...@cs.ucla.edu
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 6:38 PM
On
- Original Message -
From: SM s...@resistor.net
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:51 PM
Hi Tom,
At 04:04 31-01-2013, t.p. wrote:
Time to publication of an RFC can be reduced by cutting out the
pauses,
which could achieved by
- Original Message -
From: John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: ietf ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:44 PM
--On Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:04 + t.p.
daedu...@btconnect.com wrote:
Time to publication of an RFC can be reduced by
Time to publication of an RFC can be reduced by cutting out the pauses,
which could achieved by highlighting when they occur.
This can be done by a tool which, for every active Working Group, runs
monthly and, for every draft adopted by the Working Group, records
whether or not there has been a
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
To: m...@sap.com
Cc: John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com; Thomas Narten
nar...@us.ibm.com; ietf@ietf.org; adr...@olddog.co.uk
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:47 PM
Hi Martin,
On 01/25/2013 09:36 PM, Martin Rex wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com
To: Joe Touch to...@isi.edu
Cc: adr...@olddog.co.uk; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 9:31 PM
FWIW, I share Joe's concerns. And Stephen's responses don't really
change my mind.
This document seems to have a bit of
- Original Message -
From: Eliot Lear l...@cisco.com
To: John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com
Cc: Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com; adr...@olddog.co.uk;
ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:31 PM
John,
On 1/25/13 4:27 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
a WG can
skip WG LC if they think
- Original Message -
From: William Jordan wjordan...@gmail.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:57 AM
I've recent had to write a program to interface with a SIP lync server
and
in doing so have had to code to several rfcs. After reading and
dealing
with
- Original Message -
From: Janet P Gunn jgu...@csc.com
To: William Jordan wjordan...@gmail.com
Cc: ietf-boun...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: A modest proposal
Do none of you know what the phrase a modest proposal refers to?
Try googling
I notice too that MEP and MIP are incorrectly expanded:-(
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Huub van Helvoort huubatw...@gmail.com
To: Greg Mirsky gregimir...@gmail.com
Cc: p...@ietf.org; gen-...@ietf.org; Bitar, Nabil N
nabil.n.bi...@verizon.com; dinmo...@hotmail.com; ietf@ietf.org
- Original Message -
From: David Morris d...@xpasc.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:16 PM
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
At one point there was something that said one phone in each home
had to be
directly wired without a plug. I
I wonder if anyone else has read and understood this. I have read it,
but, pdf of a slide show that it is, I could not claim to understand
it - perhaps there is text available that would make it clearer. I do
see the bit that is like the old, IP, Classful address structure, that
the IETF tried
- Original Message -
From: Yaron Sheffer yaronf.i...@gmail.com
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; 'Alessandro Vesely' ves...@tana.it
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:52 PM
Hi Adrian,
I would suggest to start with my proposal, because it requires zero
implementation effort.
- Original Message -
From: Marc Blanchet marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca
To: Loa Andersson l...@pi.nu
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:39 PM
Le 2012-12-13 à 10:22, Loa Andersson a écrit :
Folks,
I agree that understanding the implementation status of a draft
sometimes
- Original Message -
From: Pete Resnick presn...@qti.qualcomm.com
To: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
Cc: dcroc...@bbiw.net; IETF discussion list ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:56 PM
On 11/28/12 4:45 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 11/28/12 2:45 PM, Dave
- Original Message -
From: Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org
To: IETF discussion list ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 6:00 PM
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Dale R. Worley wor...@ariadne.com
wrote:
That attendance showed me that most of the IETF meeting was a
- Original Message -
From: Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
To: Melinda Shore melinda.sh...@gmail.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:11 AM
On 15/11/2012 03:43, Melinda Shore wrote:
...
Right, I understand that (better than you might think - I live in
More thoughts inline tp three times (and apologies for the slow
response).
- Original Message -
From: Mach Chen mach.c...@huawei.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 12:24 PM
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for your comments!
Please see my reply
Original Message -
From: Carlos M. martinez carlosm3...@gmail.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 5:24 PM
I'll take the silence as a NO :-)
tp
IETF protocols have since long required to countenance both IPv6 and
Management, which for the most part means SNMP, so the
- Original Message -
From: SM s...@resistor.net
To: Ted Hardie ted.i...@gmail.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:34 PM
Hi Ted,
At 11:46 08-11-2012, Ted Hardie wrote:
Thinking a bit about the directions that conversation took, I think
there is both a relatively
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Farrel afar...@juniper.net
To: 't.p.' daedu...@btconnect.com; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 5:43 PM
Hello Tom.
Charter text is distinct from milestones.
The charter is discussed by IESG and put out for community review.
Milestones are
I worry about the allocation of sub-TLVs in this I-D.
It calls for
The following Sub-TLV changes, which comprise three updates and two
additions, are made for two TLV Types in the aforementioned sub-
registry: TLV Type 1 for Target FEC Stack, and TLV Type 21 for
Reply Path.
and it is the
I realise that the timekeeping of the IETF is not on a par with its
engineering, but it seems a shame to promulgate a new charter for which
every milestone is already several months in arrears.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: The IESG iesg-secret...@ietf.org
To: IETF-Announce
And now there seems to be another unannounced change, in that in
addition to the usual announcement format e-mails, there may also be, or
may not be, the appearance seems random, of
Subject: New Version Notification -
e-mails. This may or may not be an improvement, depending on how long
it
When I read the original IESG statement, I thought it sloppily worded,
since it did not use the same terminology as in
http://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/1id-guidelines.txt
which has been cited below.
I then wondered if the sloppy, as I saw it, wording might reflect less
than precise thinking in the
We seem to have adopted a policy of making the summer meeting overlap
what is for me the start of school holidays, and a time to avoid
travelling.
I used to think of IETF54, IETF57 and IETF66 as the norm and anything
else as an aberration, but now it seems the reverse is true.
Incidentally, I
- Original Message -
From: ALAIN AINA aal...@trstech.net
To: IETF ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 1:21 PM
I will say there are potential uses of the ITU for good.
tp
Yes, they did a brilliant job in developing standards which allow
the proprietary phone network of one
- Original Message -
From: Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:09 PM
On Tue 07/Aug/2012 15:20:35 +0200 t.p. wrote:
From: Yoav Nir y...@checkpoint.com
Would it make it easier to find if they were called notes or
corrections instead
Original Message -
From: Geoff Mulligan ge...@proto6.com
To: Richard Shockey rich...@shockey.us
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:34 PM
I also would vote to return to Minneapolis again and again even
permanently.
tp
So, would I despite London 2014 being only a train
Original Message -
From: Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 4:19 PM
On Thu 02/Aug/2012 03:28:38 -0700 Martin J. Dürst wrote:
In particular, the errata system is NOT meant to be used as an issue
tracker;
Of course we have mailing lists,
- Original Message -
From: Yoav Nir y...@checkpoint.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:58 AM
On Aug 7, 2012, at 11:29 AM, t.p. wrote:
When I Google RFC, I am sometimes directed to www.ietf.org,
- Original Message -
From: Andrew G. Malis agma...@gmail.com
To: IETF Administrative Director i...@ietf.org
Cc: IETF Discussion ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change
snip
On the
other hand, travel on 27 March should be relatively
- Original Message -
From: Samuel Weiler wei...@watson.org
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:59 PM
Sorting that list by affiliation and counting the number of names from
each affiliation, the volunteer list as of Monday included:
16 Huawai
15 Cisco
13 Ericsson
9
What is the position of the IRTF on this?
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Russ Housley hous...@vigilsec.com
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) droma...@avaya.com
Cc: IETF ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 11:53 PM
Dan:
Only protocol specifications make use of Ethertypes. The
- Original Message -
From: Noel Chiappa j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: r...@iab.org; j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu; r...@rfc-editor.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:47 PM
From: Ole Jacobsen o...@cisco.com
using the American quotation outside punctuation rule.
Original Message -
From: ssakane ssak...@cisco.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-opt...@tools.ietf.org;
sec...@ietf.org; ietf ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2012 1:55 AM
Removing the section 4.1 to an Appendix is nicer idea rather than just
Just to make public what I have hinted at privately, I think that steps
in section 4.1 may be somewhat underspecified.
They give the logic a client, one which supports both DHCP and DNS,
should
follow in order to find a KDC, with DNS information being preferred.
One scenario outlined in section 1
- Original Message -
From: ssakane ssak...@cisco.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-opt...@tools.ietf.org;
sec...@ietf.org; ietf ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 2:29 PM
Hi Tom,
Some reviewers suggested me to just remove the figure and its
Original Message -
From: Ben Niven-Jenkins b...@niven-jenkins.co.uk
To: Ole Jacobsen o...@cisco.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:36 PM
On 31 May 2012, at 09:16, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
Sounds like a difficult thing to do with any kind of predictable or
measurable
- Original Message -
From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 7:18 AM
On 05/16/2012 06:59, Barry Leiba wrote:
In fact, RFC 2119 says that the normative keywords are often
capitalized, but doesn't
- Original Message -
From: Huub van Helvoort huubatw...@gmail.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 4:52 PM
Hi Dale,
You wondered:
and btw my motto:
geek c ést chic!
What responses do you receive to your motto?
That it is spelled wrong...
tp
Sad, isn't it? All that
100 matches
Mail list logo
