not a Joke, Warren (and IETF).
The petition process is the best I have found to put in unsolicited
suggestions. The RFI process and public comments are the ways to put in
solicited comments on some topic. There is not a good merit-based process
to put suggestions and ideas into the government,
I think you may be over-estimating the filtering power of the
Internet-Draft system.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sam Crooks sam.a.cro...@gmail.com wrote:
not a Joke, Warren (and IETF).
The petition process is the best I have found to put in unsolicited
suggestions. The RFI process and
On 3/8/13 10:09 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
I think you may be over-estimating the filtering power of the
Internet-Draft system.
I think that by contrast to the current White House crowdsourcing
efforts the internet draft system looks tightly-controlled,
narrowly focused, and produces
On 2013-03-08, at 14:09, Richard Barnes r...@ipv.sx wrote:
I think you may be over-estimating the filtering power of the Internet-Draft
system.
Perhaps the implication is that if the Whitehouse were to insist upon a 1970s
publication format and employed an array of tools to reject
'm assuming this is a joke… but my subtlety filters are turned down, so who
knows...
The Internet Draft process of the IETF works so effectively at filtering out
Internet trolls because of the rigor and structure required for a proposal to
be submitted.
W
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Sam
