On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Pete Resnick presn...@qti.qualcomm.com wrote:
On 7/2/13 6:37 PM, l.w...@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
Do we have any statistics on how many appeals to the IESG fail and how many
succeed?
My quick read of http://www.ietf.org/iesg/appeal.html:
Accepted: 6
Denied:
--On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 13:02 -0400 Warren Kumari
war...@kumari.net wrote:
Thank you -- another worthwhile thing to do is look at who all
has appealed and ask yourself Do I really want to be part of
this club?
I am honored to be a member of that club. Remembering that
appeals, as
John == John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com writes:
Strong agreement.
I'm not currently a member of that club, although if I stick around the
IETF long enough it's bound to happen.
I've certainly received and reviewed appeals that I thought were a valid
contribution to the process.
Don't appeal
On 7/3/13 1:10 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 13:02 -0400 Warren Kumari
war...@kumari.net wrote:
Thank you -- another worthwhile thing to do is look at who all has appealed and ask
yourself Do I really want to be part of this club?
Other than a*very* small
+1
And don't lets forget that plenty of people have proposed schemes that WGs
have turned down and then been proven right years later.
If people are just saying what everyone else is saying here then they are
not adding any value. Rather too often WGs are started by folk seeking a
mutual
On Jul 3, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
And don't lets forget that plenty of people have proposed schemes that WGs
have turned down and then been proven right years later.
If people are just saying what everyone else is saying here then they are not
C: does my appeal look more like the club of 3, or the club of 11?
I think there's a new club of one.
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/
On 07/03/2013 05:20 PM, l.w...@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
C: does my appeal look more like the club of 3, or the club of 11?
I think there's a new club of one.
Wait, so now instead of voting we're using clubs? I think I need to pay
more attention to this thread ...
Yeah, but we don't actually count the clubs, so it's okay.
On Jul 3, 2013, at 8:33 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
Wait, so now instead of voting we're using clubs? I think I need to pay more
attention to this thread ...
If you don't read ietf, you don't get to participate in the consensus... ;)
10 matches
Mail list logo
