Section 4A refers to RFCs. I'm thinking that it should probably refer to any
submission as soon as the IPR is known about. RFC Editor enforces it for
RFC's. ID submission tool looks up the doc to see if there's an IPR disclosure
for any of the previous versions and complains if there isn't
A quick couple of questions to the list based on a document I saw recently.
If a document (an ID in this case) contains encumbered material (in this case
consists of 90%+ encumbered material), and the document is authored by the
organization (or members of the organization) that holds the
Mike,
Answer from a 10Km altitude perspective...
Our rules do not have dependencies on particular licensing
terms, whether RAND, free license, free without any notification
or specific license, defensive/reciprocal, or otherwise. The
obligation of authors and companies is to disclose whatever
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:11, Michael StJohns mstjo...@comcast.net wrote:
A quick couple of questions to the list based on a document I saw recently.
If a document (an ID in this case) contains encumbered material (in this case
consists of 90%+ encumbered material), and the document is
At 11:42 AM 6/22/2011, Scott Brim wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:11, Michael StJohns mstjo...@comcast.net wrote:
A quick couple of questions to the list based on a document I saw recently.
If a document (an ID in this case) contains encumbered material (in this
case consists of 90%+
see RFC 3979 section 4 A - a note like Mike asks for is called for
but the other Scott is also right - do not be specific - see section 11 of the
same RFC
Scott
On Jun 22, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
At 11:42 AM 6/22/2011, Scott Brim wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:11,
