There's always some excuse as to why multi-homing is never done properly.
On 03/19/13 20:38, Michael Richardson allegedly wrote:
Actually, I'd just settle for a badge that wasn't always
backwards.
It costs a lot more to get lanyards that attach at two corners.
On 19 Mar 2013 22:47, Ole Jacobsen o...@cisco.com wrote:
I can just see the list of MUST, SHOULD and MAY have attributes,
Tsk. RFC 2119 only applies to interoperability requirements, as you well
know.
So unless we're also swapping t-shirts...
, March 19, 2013 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: Getting rid of the dot
On 18/03/2013 22:10, Carsten Bormann wrote:
I wouldn't mind replacing my blue dot with an indication *what* WG I chair,
and in which area that is.
Might be a bit more logistics when chairs change, but nothing that can't
On Mar 19, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Carsten Bormann c...@tzi.org wrote:
On Mar 19, 2013, at 13:22, Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Instead of getting a new badge every meeting, maybe we should just get
an IETF86 dot on a badge we keep from meeting to meeting.
I want my badge on a
On 18/03/2013 22:10, Carsten Bormann wrote:
I wouldn't mind replacing my blue dot with an indication *what* WG I chair,
and in which area that is.
Might be a bit more logistics when chairs change, but nothing that can't be
solved with a DYMO labelmaker.
I can only speak for myself, but I
Jeffrey == Jeffrey Haas jh...@pfrc.org writes:
Jeffrey Such an exercise would probably generate a lot less
Jeffrey controversy than my unsanctioned badge experiment.
Jeffrey http://pfrc.org/~jhaas/pictures/badge.jpg
nice.
Instead of getting a new badge every meeting, maybe we
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:22:46AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
Jeffrey == Jeffrey Haas jh...@pfrc.org writes:
Jeffrey Such an exercise would probably generate a lot less
Jeffrey controversy than my unsanctioned badge experiment.
Jeffrey
On Mar 19, 2013, at 13:22, Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Instead of getting a new badge every meeting, maybe we should just get
an IETF86 dot on a badge we keep from meeting to meeting.
I want my badge on a shiny embossed metal plate with the words protocol
police on it.
Where
On 19/03/13 17:19, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Mar 19, 2013, at 13:22, Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Instead of getting a new badge every meeting, maybe we should just get
an IETF86 dot on a badge we keep from meeting to meeting.
I want my badge on a shiny embossed metal plate
I want my badge to have my name and a small screen showing the room I
just came from.
In article 51489888.6050...@internet2.edu you write:
I want my badge to have my name and a small screen showing the room I
just came from.
I want the screen to show the room I'm going to next. And it should
be upside down so I can read it.
At 10:08 AM 3/19/2013, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:22:46AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
Jeffrey == Jeffrey Haas jh...@pfrc.org writes:
Jeffrey Such an exercise would probably generate a lot less
Jeffrey controversy than my unsanctioned badge experiment.
On 03/19/2013 11:48 AM, John Levine wrote:
In article 51489888.6050...@internet2.edu you write:
I want my badge to have my name and a small screen showing the room I
just came from.
I want the screen to show the room I'm going to next. And it should
be upside down so I can read it.
And a
Doug == Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us writes:
In article 51489888.6050...@internet2.edu you write:
I want my badge to have my name and a small screen showing the room I
just came from.
I want the screen to show the room I'm going to next. And it should
be upside
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Michael Richardson wrote:
Actually, I'd just settle for a badge that wasn't always backwards.
This *is* solvable. We've been using double-sided badges at APRICOT
for years, they look the same flipped or flopped. Of course this would
require (gasp) two sets of dots, I am
snip
Actually, I'd just settle for a badge that wasn't always backwards.
While I can't claim that it is 'always' backwards - perhaps a simple(?)
solution is to print the identifying information (whatever is decided) on
both sides?
[Wait - does that double the number of dots :)? Hmmm...]
- S
On 03/19/13 19:50, Michael StJohns allegedly wrote:
There's a long history of martian badges at the IETF. During the Stanford
IETF many many years ago, there were something like a dozen Milo Medin
badges (and I seem to remember at one point Milo was wearing none of them),
as well as badges
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/19/13 20:38, Michael Richardson allegedly wrote:
Actually, I'd just settle for a badge that wasn't always
backwards.
It costs a lot more to get lanyards that attach at two corners.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin)
On 3/19/2013 4:09 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
It costs a lot more to get lanyards that attach at two corners.
Why am I encouraged every time I come across a problem that can be
solved with duct tape? :-)
Spencer
In article 5148d415.1000...@internet2.edu you write:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/19/13 20:38, Michael Richardson allegedly wrote:
Actually, I'd just settle for a badge that wasn't always
backwards.
It costs a lot more to get lanyards that attach at two corners.
If our
Oh, please, not an T-shirt designed by an IETF working group!
I can just see the list of MUST, SHOULD and MAY have attributes,
and how large is large anyway?
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
On 3/19/13 4:19 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
I want my badge on a shiny embossed metal plate with the words
protocol police on it. Where do I have to apply?
If memory serves, HP offered such a badge as Interop schwag in the
late '80s. Another old timer, Erik Fair, actually kept his for a few
Hi Spencer,
At 13:49 18-03-2013, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
There are dots, and then there are dots. The one I'd like to see
continued the most is the orange dot, for Nomcom members. We choose
the voting members at random out of a volunteer pool, with some
qualifications but not a lot, for a
I wouldn't mind replacing my blue dot with an indication *what* WG I chair, and
in which area that is.
Might be a bit more logistics when chairs change, but nothing that can't be
solved with a DYMO labelmaker.
Grüße, Carsten
On 3/18/2013 5:04 PM, SM wrote:
At 13:49 18-03-2013, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
There are dots, and then there are dots. The one I'd like to see
continued the most is the orange dot, for Nomcom members. We choose
the voting members at random out of a volunteer pool, with some
qualifications but
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:10:14PM +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote:
I wouldn't mind replacing my blue dot with an indication *what* WG I chair,
and in which area that is.
Might be a bit more logistics when chairs change, but nothing that can't be
solved with a DYMO labelmaker.
Since I live
26 matches
Mail list logo
