wrote:
Subject: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF
April 1 jokes. Date: Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 04:58:52PM -0400 Quoting Hector
Santos (hsan...@isdg.net):
This is one of those DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) arising
from globalization, April 1 HRC (Humor
Subject: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF
April 1 jokes. Date: Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 04:58:52PM -0400 Quoting Hector
Santos (hsan...@isdg.net):
This is one of those DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) arising
from globalization, April 1 HRC (Humor Recognition
Doesn't it strike you as odd that this discussion has moved towards some
sort of tacit/accepted acknowledgment of the role of joke RFCs as
insider/outsider cultural markers rather than just clever bits of writing
that are widely enjoyed? I'm a little surprised to find myself developing
sympathy
Subject: Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF
April 1 jokes. Date: Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:30:30AM -0800 Quoting Melinda
Shore (melinda.sh...@gmail.com):
Doesn't it strike you as odd that this discussion has moved towards some
sort of tacit/accepted
On Apr 8, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Melinda Shore
melinda.sh...@gmail.commailto:melinda.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway this strikes me as an unfortunate use of those documents.
Although this is not entirely a good thing, it is worth noting that one purpose
in creating borders is to lure people across
Well, the timing of this strikes me as one of those oh moments, following
as quickly on the heels of the diversity discussion. Not so much because
of language and culture issues (although those are unavoidable) but because
it strikes me as kind of unhealthy to use the April Fool RFCs as a tool to
On Apr 8, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Melinda Shore
melinda.sh...@gmail.commailto:melinda.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the timing of this strikes me as one of those oh moments, following as
quickly on the heels of the diversity discussion. Not so much because of
language and culture issues (although
I am absolutely not suggesting changing anything other than the
unfortunate attitude that the right response to someone missing the joke
is to read them out of the meeting/declare them anathema or unworthy or not
members of this community. Your beef isn't with me, it's with Måns.
Melinda
On Apr 8, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Melinda Shore
melinda.sh...@gmail.commailto:melinda.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
Your beef isn't with me, it's with Måns.
I've got no beef with either of you—I'm a vegetarian! :)
(I actually found what Måns had to say valuable, which illustrates one of the
great
Of Melinda
Shore
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 1:31 AM
To: Måns Nilsson
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF
April 1 jokes.
Doesn't it strike you as odd that this discussion has moved towards some sort
of tacit/accepted acknowledgment
Subject: Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF
April 1 jokes. Date: Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:57:54AM -0800 Quoting Melinda
Shore (melinda.sh...@gmail.com):
I am absolutely not suggesting changing anything other than the
unfortunate attitude that the right
On Apr 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, Måns Nilsson mansa...@besserwisser.org wrote:
Subject: Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) -
IETF April 1 jokes. Date: Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:57:54AM -0800 Quoting
Melinda Shore (melinda.sh...@gmail.com):
I am absolutely
This is one of those DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) arising from
globalization, April 1 HRC (Humor Recognition Culture) differences,
IETF stalization and the growth of I-D submissions. I suggest there
is a direct correlation among these factors with the end goal efficacy
of the
13 matches
Mail list logo
