At 14:02 18/12/2000 +1030, Andrew Rutherford wrote:
At 09:49 -0500 15/12/00, John C Klensin wrote:
I don't think company names on badges are harmful, and they do
help us identify each other (otherwise, we could carry the
principle to the limits and leave the names off too, replacing
them with
The point of individuality is a good one. But this should
be the choice of the person. They can write whatever they
choose for the company. For many of us it is informative.
At 02:02 PM 12/18/2000 +1030, Andrew Rutherford wrote:
At 09:49 -0500 15/12/00, John C Klensin wrote:
I don't think
At 09:49 AM 12/15/00 -0500, John C Klensin wrote:
where
we work and what we do in our day jobs inevitably impacts our
experience and perspective.
and
At 09:40 AM 12/15/00 -0800, Fred Baker wrote:
I mention the corporate relationships of the Area Directors for a very
simple reason. I think the
At 09:49 -0500 15/12/00, John C Klensin wrote:
I don't think company names on badges are harmful, and they do
help us identify each other (otherwise, we could carry the
principle to the limits and leave the names off too, replacing
them with randomly-assigned numbers).
So what about replacing
(I copy this to the poisson list, since I am somehow blocked from
the IETF list).
I am fully understand what your concern is. But,
- what should those "corporate representative" do?
- where should they go?
The point is you dont, not in IETF. Either you are interested in the work you
doing
But in retrospect, one thing he said bothered me greatly. He
mentioned there were representatives of some five hundred different
organizations at this meeting. That too is impressive. But it's
that word "representative" I find disquieting.
We are here not as corporate
Hello:
(I copy this to the poisson list, since I am somehow blocked from
the IETF list).
I am fully understand what your concern is. But,
- what should those "corporate representative" do?
- where should they go?
best regards,
--
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim - VLSM-TJT - http://rms46.vlsm.org
But it's that word "representative" I find disquieting.
I second everything you said John.
How does the IETF prevent a "RAMBUS" type scenario where
a company sits in on IETF, copies the technologies,
patents them, waits for everyone to adopt them, and then
sues everyone for infringement?
This
He also introduced the ADs as "name from employer" after the IAB
had been introduced solely by name.
I don't like the word "representatives" either.
But employers who support employees' IESG and IAB participation certainly
deserve to be recognized, since such an employee will spend a
At 3:34 PM -0800 12/14/00, John W Noerenberg II wrote:
We are here not as corporate representatives, but as individuals
committed to building the best Internet we can. Becoming part of a
working group means you leave your company badge at the door. As
the Internet has become more and more
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:11:25 EST, Kyle Lussier said:
How does the IETF prevent a "RAMBUS" type scenario where
a company sits in on IETF, copies the technologies,
patents them, waits for everyone to adopt them, and then
sues everyone for infringement?
They can't copy-and-patent the technology
Did we not just have this whole debate on the Poisson list or is this a
new flavor?
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher
The Internet Protocol Journal
Office of the CTO, Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972
GSM: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
On
12 matches
Mail list logo
