(3) While it is almost certainly too late to populate it before
Berlin, I think the meeting page template could use a Remote
Participants main section with pointers to hints and other
relevant materials, including which mailing lists one should
watch and that the web version of the meeting
On 27/07/13 11:25, Alexa Morris wrote:
We have created a small section called Remote Participation on the lower right
side of the 87 meeting page here: http://www.ietf.org/meeting/87/index.html. It
can and will be improved over time, but it's a start.
+1. The key parts are there now.
--On Saturday, July 27, 2013 03:25 -0700 Alexa Morris
amor...@amsl.com wrote:
(3) While it is almost certainly too late to populate it
before Berlin, I think the meeting page template could use a
Remote Participants main section with pointers to hints and
other relevant materials, including
I agree with your suggestion Christer. Remote-participants have right
to register their attendance because they do attend remotely and IETF
SHOULD register their information if available. Last meetings I did
not like that I was not registered because I am remote, but now I feel
more welcomed.
I
Hi,
Whatever the information is used for, or not used for, I think it would be
useful to know the number of remote participants, and where they are located.
Regards,
Christer
Sent from Windows using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-Original Message-
From: SM [s...@resistor.net]
To:
On 25/07/13 05:27, Moriarty, Kathleen wrote:
I like Aaron's suggestion to update the web with important information about a
meeting. There is a lot of mail on the list and that could be a useful way to
communicate updates, etc.
Thanks, in case the previous mail is down in the pile
I am another remote participant who would like to be able to subscribe to
the meeting-specific mailing list.
I can skip (myself) the ones about coffee and cookies, but definitely
want to read the ones about schedule changes, etc.
And even the other messages give me a taste of what it would
Janet,
I am another remote participant who would like to be able to subscribe to the
meeting-specific mailing list.
I can skip (myself) the ones about coffee and cookies, but definitely want
to read the ones about schedule changes, etc.
And even the other messages give me a taste
On 24 Jul 2013, at 16:18, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote:
Janet,
I am another remote participant who would like to be able to subscribe to
the meeting-specific mailing list.
I can skip (myself) the ones about coffee and cookies, but definitely want
to read the ones about
I see no reason why the 87attend...@ietf.org list shouldn't be open to remote
participants. Is that not the case already? We should be doing all we can to
encourage participation.
Several people pointed out already (in private e-mail) that the list might be
all that is needed, and it
The point of having a separate list for participants was to avoid
spamming the ietf list.
It can be open to everyone to subscribe to, since anyone can see the
archives, HOWEVER I recommend that only registered participants be
allowed to post.
Scott
--On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 17:46 +0100 Tim Chown
t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
I see no reason why the 87attend...@ietf.org list shouldn't be
open to remote participants. Is that not the case already? We
should be doing all we can to encourage participation.
It is already. It is a bit
Unfortunately 87...@ietf.org --the announce version of the
list-- is where the really important things, like schedule
changes, show up. And, at least as far as I can tell, there is
no way for a non-registrant to get on that list.
Has anyone tried to subscribe on the listinfo page?:
John,
As I understand it, the meeting-specific mailing lists are used either
mostly
or exclusively for chatting about stuff at the meeting that is most relevant
to folks
at the meeting. Stuff like network/power/room issues, potential social
activities,
etc.
If folks that are
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:26:21PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
Unfortunately 87...@ietf.org --the announce version of the
list-- is where the really important things, like schedule
changes, show up. And, at least as far as I can tell, there is
no way for a non-registrant to get on that list.
On 25/07/2013 05:01, Scott Brim wrote:
The point of having a separate list for participants was to avoid
spamming the ietf list.
It can be open to everyone to subscribe to, since anyone can see the
archives, HOWEVER I recommend that only registered participants be
allowed to post.
Ahem.
On Jul 24, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would envisage a fair amount of chatter about
specific remote-participation issues, like this new codec isn't
working for me, is it OK for anyone else using browser version on
operating system version?
We get
Hi,
Why couldn't remote participants register to the meeting like all other
participants?
Remote participation would of course still be free, but it would allow remote
participants to subscribe to the attendee list in the same way as other
participants.
In addition, it would provide better
Hi Christer,
At 13:54 24-07-2013, Christer Holmberg wrote:
Why couldn't remote participants register to the meeting like all
other participants?
Remote participation would of course still be free, but it would
allow remote participants to subscribe to the attendee list in the
same way as
--On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 14:36 -0400 Barry Leiba
barryle...@computer.org wrote:
Unfortunately 87...@ietf.org --the announce version of the
list-- is where the really important things, like schedule
changes, show up. And, at least as far as I can tell, there
is no way for a
Has anyone tried to subscribe on the listinfo page?:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87all
I'm sorry to be difficult about this, but the point I was trying
to make was about access by relatively remote relative
newcomers. For them, at least, the question is not does the
listinfo page
Brian: yes but non-registered thus non-ifentifiable subscribers, spammers
etc don't.
On Jul 24, 2013 3:56 PM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25/07/2013 05:01, Scott Brim wrote:
The point of having a separate list for participants was to avoid
spamming the ietf list.
On 7/24/13 10:35 AM, Eric Gray wrote:
These lists are not - AFAIK - intended for meeting participation
anywhere near as much as they are for meeting logisitics.
My experience has been that they're for both, and while
I'll be a remote participant this time I've already
subscribed to the
On 25/07/2013 11:27, Scott Brim wrote:
Brian: yes but non-registered thus non-ifentifiable subscribers, spammers
etc don't.
We're talking about a list with a useful lifetime of perhaps 3 weeks.
I really don't think spam is a big issue. Trolls might be, but they
would be *our* trolls ;-)
Anyway
I like Aaron's suggestion to update the web with important information about a
meeting. There is a lot of mail on the list and that could be a useful way to
communicate updates, etc.
Best regards,
Kathleen
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 25, 2013, at 12:12 AM, Brian E Carpenter
25 matches
Mail list logo
