The IESG wrote, On 2009-04-27 06:58 PDT:
The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider
the following document:
- 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) '
RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call. However, the
Last
Nelson,
I was referring to the maturity level as defined in RFC 2026, not
the date of publication. For standards track specifications, Section
4.1 of RFC 2026 states
Internet specifications go through stages of development, testing,
and acceptance. Within the Internet Standards Process,
Nelson:
The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider
the following document:
- 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) '
RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call. However, the
Last Call failed to highlight two
The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider
the following document:
- 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) '
RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call. However, the
Last Call failed to highlight two
At 5:15 PM +0100 4/27/09, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider the
following document:
- 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) '
RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call.
Alexey Melnikov alexey.melni...@isode.com wrote:
The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider
the following document:
- 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)' RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
This appeared on the agenda for last week's telechat, and
Alexey,
The goal of this particular exercise is to advance RFC 3852 *without*
revision, so I called out the normative references as specified in the
document: RFCs 3280 and 3281. It is true that RFC 3280 has been
obsoleted by RFC 5280, and that draft-ietf-pkix-3281update is intended
to
John Leslie wrote:
Alexey Melnikov alexey.melni...@isode.com wrote:
The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider
the following document:
- 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)' RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
This appeared on the agenda
The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider
the following document:
- 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) '
RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call. However, the
Last Call failed to highlight two normative references
