--On Tuesday, May 11, 2004 12:39 PM -0400 Scott Bradner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in general that seems OK though I'd like to see including the
possibility of the author pursuing the work within the IETF
added
Clearly I intended that option to be included. I didn't state
it for two reasons.
I get really
worried about text -- especially new text-- in these procedural
documents that enables or encourages potential protocol
lawyers... whether they are inside the IESG or outside the core
IETF community.
a reasonable worry (sorry to say) - note though that the text I'm
while Rob and I have had serious disagreements about
technical matters in the past, I've never known him to make
disparaging remarks about anyone, and a scan of the last 30
days' messages on the DNSOP list authored by Rob (and
delivered to my inbox) show NONE that mention AV8, it's
products,
This pretty much does it for me: anyone who says they are entitled
to participate in the IETF immediately goes into my spam bucket.
As others have pointed out, you've done yourself more harm than good.
I'm entitled to particpate, and I'm entitled to send email to the WG
chairs as a
