The IESG has extended the deadline for initial version (00)
submissions of Internet Drafts by 2 days (48 hours). The new deadline
is March 4, 2009 at 1700 Pacific (March 5, 2009 at 0100 UTC / GMT)
and the extension is for IETF 74 only. The deadline has been extended
due to the copyright
I find these arguments to be unpersuasive and somewhat offensive.
There is no way for any machine to ever know where one ends and the other
begins. Ergo it will be possible for someone to object to any protocol on the
grounds that someone might conflate Authorization and Authentication. This
The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Internet Mail Architecture '
draft-crocker-email-arch-11.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on
The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Internet Mail Architecture '
draft-crocker-email-arch-11.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on
On February 3rd we upgraded the Mailman list archives in order to keep
spammers from sending spam directly to our archives. It has since been
brought to our attention that, as side effect of this upgrade, some
mail lists with previously public archives had their list
configuration reset to
One thing that I did not make clear in my original email is that our
preliminary investigation indicates that no mail has been lost, it has
just been moved to private archives. Therefore we anticipate that all
mail will be restored in the appropriate public archive early next week.
Alexa
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Douglas Otis wrote:
3) Separate SMTP clients share the same IP addresses.
(Unfortunately this is also a common practice. Brazil, Poland, and
other places have many ISPs that expect hundreds or thousands of
customers to run
On Feb 25, 2009, at 11:42 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Doug,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:10:21 -0800, Doug Otis wrote:
The Sender-Header-Auth draft clouds what should be clear and
concise concepts. Organizations like Google have already remedied
many of the security concerns through
Tony Hansen wrote:
Should it be using RFC5321/RFC5322 instead of RFC2821/RFC2822, such as
RFC5322.From instead of RFC2822.From?
yes.
current draft came out just before the latest RFCs were published.
final publication will be revised (and nits fixed -- thanks for the close read.)
d/
--
The IESG has received a request from the Enhancements to Internet email
to Support Diverse Service Environments WG (lemonade) to consider the
following document:
- 'Lemonade Notifications Architecture '
draft-ietf-lemonade-notifications-10.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make
The IESG has extended the deadline for initial version (00)
submissions of Internet Drafts by 2 days (48 hours). The new deadline
is March 4, 2009 at 1700 Pacific (March 5, 2009 at 0100 UTC / GMT)
and the extension is for IETF 74 only. The deadline has been extended
due to the copyright
11 matches
Mail list logo
