Re: Last Call: Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF Version 2 to Proposed Standard

2002-12-22 Thread Yakov Rekhter
Suresh, My recommendation against using this draft as the basis for building further TE-extensions to inter-area and mixed networks was in the context of OSPF Autonomous System (AS). I also mentioned the draft has scalability limitations in extending this to inter-area and mixed

RE: Last Call: Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF Version 2 to Proposed Standard

2002-12-22 Thread Pyda Srisuresh
Yakov, Are you saying inter-area OSPF TE is not required? Without the inter-area OSPF TE, the non-backbone areas of an OPPF AS boil down to being *stub areas* and the backbone area becomes the only area. The round-robin ABR based trial-and-error CSPF computations can take inordinate amounts of

Re: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: AXFR clarify

2002-12-22 Thread Paul Vixie
This thread is finally getting interesting. On the other hand, if Olafur is in fact making a living doing BIND9 development and coding for ISC or one of their clients, that might be called a conflict of interest when the issue at hand is that a specific document is too BIND9 specific. What