-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Franck == Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How would replacing ICANN (or the IETF) with the ITU
make things any less unilateral? As I see it, all that it would
accomplish is that it would give governments and corporations
a more
At this time on this date, I cannot get a connection to http://www.isoc.org.
Have you ever gotten this connection?
Can you get it now?
Merry Christmas to all at your house;-)...\Stef
At 16:50 -0800 12/8/03, Ole J. Jacobsen wrote:
See http://www.isoc.org/
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and
Einar Stefferud writes:
At this time on this date, I cannot get a connection to http://www.isoc.org.
Have you ever gotten this connection?
It worked fine for me just now.
Dear Vint,
You may guess that I am deeply involved in that prepartory issues and I
probably can help with some (I will try) unbiased understandings (I am
sorry if this hurts some) of what happens, focusing on ICANN and IETF.
At 00:36 09/12/03, vinton g. cerf wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 05:37:18 EST, shogunx said:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, vinton g. cerf wrote:
at the moment it is not well constituted to develop policy.
No, but it well constituented to be. Is it only necessary that it be
reconstituted.
Maybe its like the saying when all you have is a hammer, everything looks
like a nail. The global funds transfer system (SWIFT) used for transferring
billions of dollars an hour had a security scare and fell back to an almost
manual system for a few days. It worked fine functionally (slightly
Vint;
Unfortunately, the discussion has tended to center on ICANN as the
only really visible example of an organization attempting to develop
policy (which is being treated as synonymous with governance).
To be practical, considering that ICANN never acted as the authority
of the Internet
At 15:46 09/12/03, Dan Kolis wrote:
When polititians find out they can squelch opinion by something as simple as
a court order to delete a DNS entry, it won't take a week before instances
of it are common. The only reason they haven't is they don't understand
technology enough to know exactly how
At 21:24 08/12/03, Bill Manning wrote:
% Either we need the root system and it must match the basic surety
rules for
% a critical infrastructure, or we just want to keep the fossil concept the
% way it was designed 20 years ago.
Why do you think this is an either/or proposition?
This thread
% On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Bill Manning wrote:
%
% % Or more simply, may be kill the real time root servers concept and review
% % the DNS as a non God centralized system? If there was nothing to protect
% % because there would be nothing, we would risk far less from there.
%
% Been there,
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Bill Manning wrote:
% Or more simply, may be kill the real time root servers concept and review
% the DNS as a non God centralized system? If there was nothing to protect
% because there would be nothing, we would risk far less from there.
Been there, done that.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Randy Presuhn wrote:
Hi -
From: Dean Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Randy Presuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: just a brief note about anycast
...
Well, they think we are the chauvenists of
On 9 Dec 2003, Franck Martin wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:15, Randy Presuhn wrote:
Hi -
How would replacing ICANN (or the IETF) with the ITU
make things any less unilateral? As I see it, all that it would
accomplish is that it would give governments and corporations
a more
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 08:26, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Randy Presuhn wrote:
Hi -
From: Dean Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Randy Presuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: just a brief note about anycast
Last Call
Working Draft. The document is available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/
Review end date: 5 March 2004
Mailing list : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (archive [2])
The TAG has scheduled an extended Last Call review period so that
groups inside and outside of W3C have
15 matches
Mail list logo
