Thanks for your review!
Authors, can you prepare a new version that addresses these issues?
Jari
Ben Campbell wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
The IESG wrote, On 2009-04-27 06:58 PDT:
The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider
the following document:
- 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) '
RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call. However, the
Last
Nelson,
I was referring to the maturity level as defined in RFC 2026, not
the date of publication. For standards track specifications, Section
4.1 of RFC 2026 states
Internet specifications go through stages of development, testing,
and acceptance. Within the Internet Standards Process,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04
Errata:
Original Text:
,---
The tendency is to have the MUA highlight the address associated with
this *signing identity* in some way, in an attempt to show the user
the address from which the mail was sent.
'---
Corrected Text:
Nelson:
The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider
the following document:
- 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) '
RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call. However, the
Last Call failed to highlight two
Here is a dictionary definition of Beyond reproach:
Beyond reproach: So good as to preclude any possibility of criticism.
Last time I looked, RFC 3777 did not include this definition as a requirement
for the nomcom in selection of I* candidates.
Good thing, too. We seem to have gotten by
Bernard Aboba wrote:
Here is a dictionary definition of Beyond reproach:
Beyond reproach: So good as to preclude any possibility of criticism.
Last time I looked, RFC 3777 did not include this definition as a
requirement for the nomcom in selection of I* candidates.
Good thing, too.
The IESG has received a request from the Geographic Location/Privacy WG
(geopriv) to consider the following document:
- 'Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance '
draft-ietf-geopriv-sip-lo-retransmission-02.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Mobile IPv6 Support for Dual Stack Hosts and Routers '
draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal-10.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Mobility EXTensions for IPv6 Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Jari Arkko and
A new IETF working group has been formed in the Internet Area. For
additional information, please contact the Area Directors or the WG
Chairs.
Multiple Interfaces (mif)
---
Current Status: Active Working Group
Chairs:
Margaret Wasserman
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification
(iCalendar) '
draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis-10.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Calendaring and Scheduling Standards
Simplification Working Group.
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'BGP IPsec Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute '
draft-ietf-softwire-encaps-ipsec-03.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Softwires Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Ralph Droms and Jari Arkko.
A URL of this
A new IETF working group has been formed in the Internet Area. For
additional information, please contact the Area Directors or the WG
Chairs.
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
--
Last Modified: 2009-04-23
Current status: Working Group
75th IETF Meeting
Stockholm, Sweden
July 26-31, 2009
Host: .SE
Be sure to make your reservation at one of the four Stockholm hotels
where we have a block of rooms held. Cut-off dates for release of our
block are earlier than usual. Hotel information can be found at:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5510
Title: Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC)
Schemes
Author: J. Lacan, V. Roca,
J. Peltotalo, S. Peltotalo
Status:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5511
Title: Routing Backus-Naur Form (RBNF): A
Syntax Used to Form Encoding Rules
in Various Routing Protocol Specifications
Author: A.
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5520
Title: Preserving Topology Confidentiality in Inter-Domain
Path Computation Using a Path-Key-Based Mechanism
Author: R. Bradford, Ed.,
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5521
Title: Extensions to the Path Computation
Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Route
Exclusions
Author: E. Oki, T. Takeda,
18 matches
Mail list logo
