RE: VIRUS WARNING

this is a good idea !! maybe the security wg could look into this. Jeff, Marcus , any comments ?? /pd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 2:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VIRUS WARNING On Fri, 12 May 2000 13:38:43

RE: Should IETF do more to fight computer crime?

-Original Message- From: Vernon Schryver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 4:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Should IETF do more to fight computer crime? From: "Dawson, Peter D" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jacob Palme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: Privacy (RE: Should IETF do more to fight computer crime?)

-Original Message- From: Randy Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 1:55 PM To: Dawson, Peter D Cc: 'IETF general mailing list' Subject: RE: Privacy (RE: Should IETF do more to fight computer crime?) Is there a GRIP online email archive ?? details about all

RE: Storage over Ethernet/IP

--Original Message- -From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 6:27 PM -To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Subject: RE: Storage over Ethernet/IP -The point being made, remade and made again here is: -- Any protocol that offers no

RE: Storage over Ethernet/IP

--Original Message- -From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 1:56 PM -To: Dawson, Peter D -Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Subject: Re: Storage over Ethernet/IP - - -In message -[EMAIL PROTECTED], -"Dawson, Peter D" writes: - - ---Origin

RE: remove me from list

--Original Message- -From: Robert G. Ferrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 3:51 PM -To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Subject: Re: remove me from list - SNIP.. - -As to forwarding it to the "appropriate agency for -pursuit...," good luck. -If you find one that

pollem

I looking for info on the s/w routine "pollem"... (which is used for firewall monitoring.) any pointers/urls ? thanks /pd

RE: Is WAP mobile Internet??

--Original Message- -From: Jon Crowcroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 11:19 AM -To: Parkinson, Jonathan -Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Subject: Re: Is WAP mobile Internet?? - - - -In message -[EMAIL PROTECTED], -"Parkinson, Jonathan" typed: -

RE: Heard at the IETF

oh... did the other members on the elevator dispute the prime number sequence ..I.E as the elevator descended or ascended ?? if so.. then they were part of the ietf convention else they were a bunch of normal geeks --Original Message- -From: Dennis Glatting [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Heard at the IETF

--Original Message- -From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 3:52 PM -To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Cc: Jon Crowcroft; Dawson, Peter D; [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Subject: Re: Heard at the IETF - SNIPPED .. - -And of course, security folks want

RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!

--Original Message- -From: Dennis Glatting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 8:32 AM -To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Subject: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! - - -Nonetheless, with IPv6, I naively hoped, until last night, the -conservation of space issues

RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!

--Original Message- -From: Rakers, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 9:41 AM -To: 'Dennis Glatting'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Subject: RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! - - The household will perform NAT for -all devices -within (one street address

RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!

v6 address space works out to about 1500 address per sq mtr of the earth's surface... NOW..how many house fit on 1 sqm ? --Original Message- -From: Parkinson, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 10:23 AM -To: 'Rakers, Jason'; 'Dennis Glatting'; [EMAIL

RE: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN

..and neither do I see the reason why one would waste their time 'harping' about the issue... --Original Message- -From: Russ Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 11:45 AM -To: Jean Camp; vinton g. cerf; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SNIPPED - -I

RE: ferul/farrell postings

--Original Message- -From: Tony Hain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 2:14 PM -To: William Allen Simpson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Cc: Beatrice Dominguez-Meiers -Subject: RE: ferul/farrell postings - - -Because it is not a technology problem... Join Harald's list

RE: Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe

could the list owner block these repetive msg's .. i tkae it.. there is a glitch somewhere --Original Message- -From: Netscape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 7:19 AM -To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Subject: Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe - - -Dear cnri, - -The

RE: Proposal to deal with archiving of I-Ds

oh ...hold on folks !, a pgp signature for an expire i-d ?. I think the question was "about whether TO archive or NOT archive ID". some consensus right now is, Some authors = No ; Some authors = yes; Libarian = yes; Historian = yes; IETF = no; and lets stick to the question of why/how ID's

RE: LDAP Client API in C with Notification of the end of a reques t

strtok() can be used to break the string pointed to by s1 into a sequence of tokens, each of which is delimited by one or more characters from the string pointed to by s2. strtok() considers the string s1 to consist of a sequence of zero or more text tokens separated by spans of one