Hi,
I have reviewed draft-dusseault-impl-reports-02 from operations
directorate point of view.
Operations directorate reviews are solicited primarily to help the
area
directors improve their efficiency, particularly when preparing for
IESG
telechats, and allowing them to focus on documents
I am also not sure I would let the TC names have a suffix of
Type.
But that may be personal taste.
There have been quite a few textual conventions with the suffix TC
I think that makes it easy to see this is a Textual convention,
including in IMPORT clauses. But that may be personal
Hi,
I have reviewed draft-ietf-lemonade-convert-17.txt as part of the
Operations and Management directorate effort. These comments were
primarily written for the benefit of the OM area directors. Document
editors and WG chairs
should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
Hi,
This conversation of the IETF65 location started with an issue of
security.
I'd like to get this discussion back on track.
What are the security requirements for a distributed burrito
processing protocol?
If you are traveling from the conference hotel to a restaurant and are
mugged, is that
Hi,
What we are seeing is increasing use of fully automated tools
that don't
have humans identifying which octets are MIB and which are
code. You can't
do that with plain ASCII.
MIB modules may be a bad example for you to use. All MIB modules start
with a BEGIN character string and end
Hi,
As a MIB Doctor and chair of the Bridge WG, I have been working with
the IEEE 802.1 WG, who will assume maintenance responsiblities for the
Bridge WG Mib modules.
IEEE 802.1 publishes their standards in PDF. We had to make a special
request that they make the MIB portion of their documents
Lets go ahead and ask then -
Does anyone else think that IETF should allow documents which
format/structure is not publicly known as one of the ways to
distribute IETF specifications?
Not me (or not I, whichever)
David Harrington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Burger, Eric wrote:
This list is for discussions relating to the requirements,
definition,
and directions for message notifications.
Is this message notifications related to specific technologies, or is
this a general notification mechanism?
If it's a general notification
Hi,
Personally, I'd rather see the issue of working through NATs and
firewalls solved at the SSH level, and then SNMP and other SSH-using
applications, such as Netconf and CLI, could use the solution in a
consistent manner.
The OM community has gone through a multi-year effort to better
