RE: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration

2007-09-07 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
Yao, I sympathize. However, there are other things for you to consider: 1) There are available discounts - a) the price for full time students is significantly lower (although several times what it has been in the past) and requires only that

RE: Charging I-Ds

2007-07-31 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
Melinda, I was trying to avoid weighing in on this discussion. The discussion is essentially inane, and that's (at least part of) your point. After all, the thought that someone might be asked to work on an ID, and then - in addition to volunteering their time to do the work - they

RE: RFID (was: identifying yourself at the mic)

2007-03-27 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
Excellent idea - NOT!!! All we need is something else to wrap in aluminum foil... Thanks! -- Eric Gray Principal Engineer Ericsson From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 10:55 AM To: David

RE: [CONTENT] Re: identifying yourself at the mic

2007-03-27 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
It's not hard to say, just hard to remember to say. Frankly, I have a lot less difficulty with automated recognition of anyone who steps up to the microphone than I do with recognizing people as they walk in and out of conference rooms. Plus, having a means to recognize who is at the mike, might

RE: RFID (was: identifying yourself at the mic)

2007-03-27 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:45 AM To: Eric Gray (LO/EUS) Cc: David Morris; ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: RFID (was: identifying yourself at the mic) Importance: High Eric, Why not? We each already

RE: RFID (was: identifying yourself at the mic)

2007-03-27 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
From: Schliesser, Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:27 PM To: Eric Gray (LO/EUS) Cc: ietf@ietf.org Subject: RE: RFID (was: identifying yourself at the mic) Importance: High Eric

RE: [rbridge] Last Call: draft-ietf-trill-routing-reqs (TRILL Routing Requirements in Support of RBridges) to Informational RFC

2007-03-22 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
Dinesh, Please see one more question below... Thanks! -- Eric Gray Principal Engineer Ericsson -Original Message- From: Dinesh G Dutt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:15 PM To: Eric Gray (LO/EUS) Cc: ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; IETF

RE: [rbridge] Last Call: draft-ietf-trill-routing-reqs (TRILL RoutingRequirements in Support of RBridges) to Informational RFC

2007-03-21 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
Harald, As it was originally chartered, the TRILL working group allowed scope for definition of TRILL bridges that could be cheaply produced, modulo the inclusion of a ink-state routing protocol as a complicating factor. It is not clear at this point that this has changed.

RE: [rbridge] Last Call: draft-ietf-trill-routing-reqs (TRILL Routing Requirements in Support of RBridges) to Informational RFC

2007-03-21 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
Dinesh, Thank you for your comments. Please see below... Thanks! -- Eric Gray Principal Engineer Ericsson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dinesh G Dutt Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 10:33 PM To: ietf@ietf.org Cc:

RE: [rbridge] Last Call: draft-ietf-trill-routing-reqs (TRILLRoutingRequirements in Support of RBridges) to Informational RFC

2007-03-20 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
Silvano, Thanks for posting these comments. Please see below. -- Eric Gray Principal Engineer Ericsson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Silvano Gai Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:35 PM To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: [EMAIL

RE: Game theory and IPv4 to IPv6

2007-03-15 Thread Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
Not sure I'm phrasing this correctly in this context, but I don't think that service providers are the rational choice actors in this scenario - any more than equipment vendors are. It seems to me the main actors in applying gaming to this problem are still the end users. It is the case that

RE: About Gen-ART reviews

2007-02-13 Thread Eric Gray \(LO/EUS\)
Brian, I think it would be a bad thing if it was a general rule. At the level/frequency applied to date, it's a good thing. Thanks! -- Eric Gray Principal Engineer Ericsson -Original Message- From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13,

RE: Revised I-D: draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-03.txt

2007-02-09 Thread Eric Gray \(LO/EUS\)
] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:10 PM To: Mipshop; ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org Cc: Eric Gray (LO/EUS); Jari Arkko; Wassim Haddad; Vijay Devarapalli; Stefano Faccin Subject: Revised I-D: draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-03.txt Hello folks, we updated draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba

RE: Referencing BCPs [Re: ion-procdocs open for public comment]

2007-01-31 Thread Eric Gray \(LO/EUS\)
Dave, Interestingly enough, your observation provides the strongest argument I've yet seen for assigning a standard number to any RFC that has becomes a Proposed Standard. -- Eric -Original Message- From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 31,

RE: Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-02.txt

2007-01-31 Thread Eric Gray \(LO/EUS\)
exactly what change I was suggesting... -Original Message- From: Christian Vogt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:48 PM To: Eric Gray (LO/EUS) Cc: Wassim Haddad (KI/EAB); Jari Arkko (JO/LMF); Mark Townsley; gen-art@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re