the IETF secretariat.
Regards,
Jordi
- Original Message -
From: Rosen, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'JORDI PALET MARTINEZ' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:14 PM
Subject: RE: i18n name badges
Let's keep going.
I'd
Let's keep going.
I'd contribute, say, $25, plus write some code towards getting a barcode
reader (or, maybe RFID??) for each meeting room that would be used to
swipe in and automate the blue sheets.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 1:06 PM
To: Rosen, Brian; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml
At 6:15 PM -0400 8/27/03, Rosen, Brian wrote:
I therefore have a modest proposal:
Allow the submission of an xml file meeting
To: Rosen, Brian
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml
Rosen, Brian wrote:
Allow the submission of an xml file meeting the requirements
of RFC2629
along with the text file (and optional ps file) for an
Internet Draft.
The value
makes it harder to reach rough consensus.
Let's just do one simple thing -- allow xml, and see how it goes.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:28 AM
To: Michael Thomas
Cc: Paul Hoffman / IMC; Rosen, Brian; '[EMAIL
Lyndon
You make some good points.
However, I have not proposed that we change the RFC process,
and I've been very carefull to propose that we only accept xml
optionally, retaining the requirement to 'send text'. I did so
quite deliberately, and I'd really appreciate it if we could
take this one
Jean-Jacques
Is it not better to add xml incremental to text, rather than
exclusive OR? If we demand that the I=D editor have a tool
and use it to generate text, we open a large box of problems.
What if the version of the tool the author used is different
from the I-D editor? What if the xml
Vernon
Are you suggesting that we would need a new working group
to allow 2629 conformant xml to be optionally submitted with
text to the I-D archive?
Why?
I'm not proposing any new RFC. Guidelines to authors is not
an RFC. 2629 is an RFC.
The xml2rfc tool, which is not the only tool around,
Good points, esp. the references to 2234.
May I also point out that many SIP stacks use automatically generated
parsers from the ABNF description. These have many, but not all, of
the advantages claimed by ASN.1. It was a goal of the RFC3261
work to make the ABNF grammar complete enough to use
Well, but
Most PC designs use phase lock techniques which keep external
signals way below the CPU operating frequency
There are legal limits for radiation; most laptops and all
PDA devices are "Class B" which is a pretty low level.
The real issue I
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 7:18 PM
To: Rosen, Brian
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rfc publication suggestions
What happens now is silliness due to
the known queue length - we put things in we know are deficient,
always assuming we will have the issues resolved before
An interesting metric would be the time from the date something enters
a queue to the time its status is first changed - i.e. the first time
the editor looks at it. I believe that is some number of months.
Once the editor picks it up, then its time in queue is more a function
of outside
Interestingly, 8.5 x 11 comes about because of writing, not reading.
Books are smaller than 8.5 x 11. Tablets are 8.5 x 11, and typewriters
copied that. Laser printers copied typewriters. Stenographers used smaller
tablets because they had to hold them in their hands rather than put them on
On this subject, may I suggest that we have outgrown hotel conference
facilities.
The place where we have outgrown them is hallways -- hotel facilities simply
do not have adequate hallways to accommodate us. Much of the value of the
meeting
is the impromptu "BOF"s that occur in the hallways and
That gave me a lead on a better one:
Network Working Group J. Postel
Request for Comments: 1025 ISI
September 1987
TCP AND IP
I also looked at the references in RFC1025, and found that IEN-70 and
IEN-77 are not on line. However, IEN-165 is:
http://www.normos.org/ietf/ien/ien-160.txt.1
J. Postel IEN 160 ISI 7 November 1980 Internet Meeting Notes -- 7-8-9
October 1980
and states:
BAKE OFF SUMMARY Dave Mills reported on
Although, actually, what would *really* benefit the
historians would be
searchable archives of the working group mailing lists, but that's a
different issue ;)
Why is that?
Seems to me it's part of the same issue, and technologically,
whatever solution you find for one ought to be
17 matches
Mail list logo
