Hi all,
At 19:52 06/09/00 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Jon Crowcroft wrote:
>
>>
>> In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maha
>> devan Iyer typed:
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Barathy, RamaSubramaniam wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hello Everybody,
>> >>>
>> >>> Would it not be
Hello,
At 12:05 01/06/00 +0100, Salavat R. Magazov wrote:
>Hello
>
>I am a bit confused by the acronims used in IETF drafts, e.g. in >some
places...
IETF works and discussions formats are very important not only because the
task but also because it can serves as guide to other technicals
discusi
Hello Bob,
For Internet improvent and sucess you need the people at this list,
Not because their are brillant
Not because their experince
Not because Intenet need continuity
...
Just because Nobody hate more the actual Intenet degradation, Nobody wants
more that Internet serves for humanity suces
Hello Dele,
At 22:56 21/02/00 -0800, you wrote:
>We should know that computer technology is as old as we wanted to
>accept. The whole thing was not meant for public consumption until after
>sometime. Now that it is in the public's domain, many are using the
>system reasonably while others find jo
Hello Zheng,
At 10:03 21/05/00 +0800, you wrote:
>I want to ask him some questions.
>thank you very much!
>
>
In order to have an universal and permanent e-mail address system wich
allow us to:
No need to know wich is his current ISP.
Less unusefull trafic as we avoid mistakes when somebody chan
Hello Zozo,
At 17:57 10/05/99 +0300, you wrote:
>What are the benefits from
>"Integeration between Mobile IP and Ad hoc networks"?
>
>
I like a Integration wich allow small entrepenurials to develop aplications
for mobile, i.e. I think that will have a great future the games for
w
Hello Nyagudi,
At 10:33 14/05/00 +0300, you wrote:
>It may just be time for the IETF to develop a financial standards work group
>seperate from the applications work group. I can even forsee a Simple Cash
>Transfer Protocol? any objections?
As a consumer I will like the posibility of doing anon
Hello Jacob,
At 19:51 12/05/00 +0200, Jacob Palme wrote:
>At 13.59 -0400 0-05-11, Scot Mc Pherson wrote:
>> I am not so sure I totally agree. Why exactly do we need HTML based
>> e-mail...Is it really necessary? E-mail is a service for transmitting a
>> written message, and written messages
Hello,
At 17:28 04/05/00 -0400, Lillian Komlossy wrote:
>Let's not make it political. We've all been attacked, it is >pointless..
The people who want to do citizens security a political issue probably are
the same comunist reaccionary wich disagree with the future Army
privatization, the ones wic
Hello Vernon,
At 21:48 12/04/00 -0600, you wrote:
>I also think you need to give up the idea of
>having computers make value judgements, but maybe that's just my lack of
>imagination.
>
Sure that computers will improve doing judgements, but don´t lost the main
force on Interenet, there are hund
gt;
> If IPSEC or other strong end-to-end encryption or authentication would
> interfere with a protocol or application, then it is almost certainly
> fatally flawed idea on other technical, administrative, legal, political,
> or ethical grounds.
>
>
> ...
&
Hello Vernon,
>listed are technical nits. If you assume that "traffic redirection"
>and an "interception proxy" are good things, then you might well worry
>about the "lack of HTTP/1.1 compliance for proxy caches" or whether
>"interception proxies break client cache directives." You will not
>qu
Hi folks and all,
At 10:04 06/04/00 JST, Masataka Ohta wrote:
>Online business patents are, at large, ineffective and harmless.
>
>We can have servers outside of US and there is no legislation (even
>under US laws. note that the servers can serve yet another countries)
>to make the servers illeg
Hi folks and all,
I think that as much conflicts that can be solved without the traditional
way: regulation + represion = burocracy + injustice, will be better for users.
Of course that always will remain Gansters that will require traditional
represion ways, i.e.:
At 02:25 02/04/00 +0300, Steph
Hello,
At 16:26 30/03/00 +0930, you wrote:
>At 16:52 29.03.00 -0800, James P. Salsman wrote:
>>Some educational software advocates and I are considering
>>asking the IETF to suspend control of certain aspects of
>>HTML forms from the W3C until microphone upload issues are
>>addressed.
>No matter
Internet Tsunami - 392 pages
>just published. See http://cookreport.com/ipeverywhere.shtml
>
>
Best Regards,
Salvador Vidal
**
You get this message because you "subscribe" to my distribution list,
16 matches
Mail list logo
