site: http://dris.hust.edu.cn
Regards
Wang Liang
Liang
- Original Message -
From: wang liang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Melinda Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: dris mailing list
Because this BOF is determined in Feb 16,this mail list and relatted
archive
is not prepared very well
Because this BOF is determined in Feb 16,this mail list and relatted archive
is not prepared very well.
These problems will be solved as soon as possible.
Thanks.
Wang Liang
- Original Message -
From: Melinda Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 1
Retrieval Infrastructure(iiri)
=
CHAIRS: Guo Yiping ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Wang Liang ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Co-Chair: Andrew Newton([EMAIL PROTECTED])
What's the main purpose of Internet? Information retrieval and exchanging.
But what's the most important principle
After publishing the message propose some information retrieval protocols
for Internet, we received many advices. Now we
want to build a new work group for this issue, asking for more advices.
Information retrieval service may exceed E-mail
service and become the most import service of Internet,
The main aim of DRIS is to build the information retrieval infrastructure
for Internet. XML/RDF/Webservice is just tools.
In fact, in IRTF,http://www.irtf.org,an organization for the evolution of
the future Internet(supported by IETF)
There has been a work group Information Infrastructure
The link is moved to http://www.lib.hust.edu.cn/dl-lib/English/main.htm
More content will be translated.
you should provide us with a link(http://202.114.9.200/English/main.htm)
that works.
Please,please learn some basic knowledge about search engine.
Now we are discussing the search engine, one of most important services of
Internet.
Asking for advices is first step, then a work group may be proposed. So
don't worry about where we discuss this issue.
without looking into
For some reason, the IP in CERNET isn't accessible outside China.
I will solve this problem as soon as possible.
but I'm more interested in something else: I'd like to see more semantic
information in search engines. Eventually, this would allow queries
like which actors played in movies
Your original post presents several arguments against the current crop of
search engines and proposes a new distributed search engine system, but
this
is an _indexing_ function, not a _retrieval_ function.
DRIS's a real search engine.
Although we say DRIS just builds the information
In fact, our project is just a digital library project. DRIS is its main
part. Another part is [EMAIL PROTECTED], a intellitent search system, which
will directly answer all your question in the future. But now it can only
answer some questions about routine of libray. Such system is also called
Happy new year!
You could find more information about our project in
http://202.114.9.200/English/main.htm
More content will be translated in these days.
Sorry it took so long to get back to you. I've been busy and haven't
been able to work with these yet, but will aim to do so later on this
Paul Robinson,
We can tweak the spec and the technology to put ownership back
where it belongs, but it needs some thought.
Related papers in word format were sent to you.
In fact, our system can be regarded as an information shared platform. To
integrated different kinds of information
I believe you are talking about information *indexing* service,
not information *retrieval* service
DRIS will build the information retrieval infrastructure for Internet, but
not the final search engines. Many intelligent search systems can apply DRIS
as their data source and provide high
Propose some information retrieval protocols for Internet.
Now most services of Internet such as E-mail, BBS, and FTP are all based on
public protocol. There is no secret technology in these services. But the
information retrieval service, may be the most important service on
Internet, is still
If I find there is no a group for some important issues about Internet, and
It may be necessary to build a new one,what should I do?Who will deal with
this kind of suggestion?Where can I find the detailed process of asking
for a new work group?thanks.
I submitted my I-D several weeks ago,but I haven't received even a piece of
advice.This I-D is about the search protocol for library.Now there are more
and more databases in library,we often have to search in many databases one
by one to get the precise and comprehensive recorder.It's maybe not
how to get a filename for ID?I have sent a request to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for a filename for a new ID.But there are no
response till now.It's a individual ID.Creating a filename by myself will be
ok?
I want to create a ID in Windows.Is there any software like nroff and troff
in windows? Will MS-Word or something else be useful? thanks.
I think there should be a work group to discuss the new possible format of
ID.PDF or other format can be more efficient than just text version, Why
should we just stick to the ASCII text.
Rosen, Brian wrote:Allow the submission of an xml file meeting the requirements of RFC2629along with the text file (and optional ps file) for an Internet Draft.
I totally agree with it.RFC2629 may be something need improvement.Now some protocols arecompletely written in XML schema,like UDDI.Even
21 matches
Mail list logo
