I did it once - it took 2 or 3 hours *it was quite a while back and I do not
remember)
there were no significant expenses - the depo was in Boston my only
expense was a few hours parking - the depo was done in the office of the
law firm that was providing the IETF with pro-bono legal services
I did not do them any favor - I did the IETF a favor (as the then ISOC VP for
Standards)
Scott
On Jul 22, 2012, at 4:43 PM, John R Levine wrote:
I did it once - it took 2 or 3 hours *it was quite a while back and I do not
remember)
there were no significant expenses - the depo was in
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com wrote:
In theory yes, a signed document would be sufficient.
In practice it would then require an expert witness at $400/hr to
explain that it meant it was authentic.
The depositions are typically to state that the RFC's
Yes, we typically then point out that much of what they want is
available on line, and frequently negotiate with opposing counsel to
moderate demands for depositions, etc., but, in the end, we propose,
the judge and opposing counsel dispose. That won't change.
I'd want to set the depo rate
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:31 AM, John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote:
Yes, we typically then point out that much of what they want is
available on line, and frequently negotiate with opposing counsel to
moderate demands for depositions, etc., but, in the end, we propose,
the judge and opposing
On Jul 22, 2012, at 21:38, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
IETF volunteers will not be paid from these fees.
I've been following this discussion only with one ear, but, I can't figure out
why somebody would volunteer to do this.
Grüße, Carsten
For people with unique skills or knowledge, $800/hr is not unusual.
So long as the rate is published ahead of time, you're not going to
get much argument. (Yes, we know it's high. But we've already told
you how to download stuff yourself for free.)
Please note : out of pocket expenses (if
I did it once - it took 2 or 3 hours *it was quite a while back and I do not
remember)
there were no significant expenses - the depo was in Boston my only
expense was a few hours parking - the depo was done in the office of the
law firm that was providing the IETF with pro-bono legal services
I did not do them any favor - I did the IETF a favor (as the then ISOC VP for
Standards)
Really, if you didn't make the opposing party pay for your time, you did
them a favor. It's absolutely expected to pay hostile witnesses for their
depo time. (If nobody mentioned it, why would they offer
Yeah, with what the lawyers in the room are getting per hour, there is no
reason to volunteer as an expert wittness. Ever. Even if you are there
on behalf of the IETF, if the IETF prevails, they can only recover costs
they incurred and if they don't, make a donation.
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, John R
Richard,
On Jul 20, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
On Jul 20, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 7/20/2012 7:25 AM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
We have the technology. Surely a CMS signed object (or even just an HTTPS
download) would provide adequate authentication that
Marshall
Jiankang Yao
- Original Message - From: IETF Administrative Director
i...@ietf.org
To: IETF Announcement List ietf-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: i...@ietf.org; i...@iab.org; ietf@ietf.org; wgcha...@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 9:07 PM
Subject: Feedback Requested on Draft
12 matches
Mail list logo
