On 27/02/2013, at 9:59 AM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:
On Feb 26, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Roberto Peon grm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure that the deadline serves any positive purpose so long as we
keep all of the versions anyway.
It certainly is annoying the way it is now and
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:16:30 AM Mark Nottingham wrote:
I think that's a poor trade-off. As discussed before, the publishing embargo
disrupts work that isn't in sync with meetings. This is a tangible and
somewhat high price to pay just to serve as a procrastination-buster for
those
I'd be willing to deal with an embargo for draft-ietf-*, but don't see at all
why it extends
to other drafts.
We have software. Embargo drafts for WGs that are actually meeting
during the preceding week, leave the others alone.
