> >might be better as:
> >In no way should this experiment or any future BCP for this small
> >number of cases take precendence over the IETF's normal mode of
> >operation. Specifically, these procedures are only to be
> >used when a working group agrees to use them.
> >
> Define "a
Scott Bradner wrote:
might be better as:
In no way should this experiment or any future BCP for this small
number of cases take precendence over the IETF's normal mode of
operation. Specifically, these procedures are only to be
used when a working group agrees to use them.
Define "agree
I think this is still not clear enough that it describes optional processes
that can be used *if desired* by a working group
e.g. the first sentence of abstract would be better if it said
something like:
This document proposes an optional experimental set of alternative
decision-making pr
