I strongly disagree with David's characterization of the IETF, his
characterization of how things should work, his claim that the problem
he has identified should be fixed and the proposed solution.
Consider this a vote of wrong direction. If it becomes apparent
that David is attracting
...
Anyone who agrees with the CfC statement, and doesn't say anything, is
fine, because the CfC doesn't need or want their support. The CfC will
stand or fall based upon the size of the disagree and replied group.
That's pretty much how I've seen IETF consensus work over the years.
As
Sandy,
experience shows that you would only create more traffic. The smart
people who support the statement will not answer your call, but will
comment what those who object will answer. As I doubt you can word a
statement in such a way people who object may simply answer no.
There are
Are you guys taking turns, saying the same thing over and over again?
For the record, I'm not taking sides in any of the current questions
about ASCII/Word/AmiPro/etc, or DKIM, or the other discussions filling
my inbox. I'm trying to come up with a way for the participants in
those
