Per Dave's suggestion, I'll take this to the M3 Technical list. When we believe
we're well-situated, we'll come back to ietf-smtp or marf.
FWIW, Dispatch suggested the dmarc or dkim lists. Thanks folks, we'll be back.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -
On 9/27/2023 7:41 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
We don't really have a venue that talks about feedback loops that I
can find,
I strongly suggest pursuing this first in a group devoted to anti-abuse
email, with a range of software developers and platform providers.
This will ensure both subj
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023, at 9:06 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On 9/27/23 13:36, Brotman, Alex wrote:
> > I've attached a draft that uses attributes of a passing DKIM
> > signature to create a DNS label that can be used to discover an FBL
> > address. This feedback address can be used by message r
On 9/27/23 16:47, Brotman, Alex wrote:
Some senders use a different selector when sending from different ESPs while
they use the same d= in the DKIM signature.
Don't same d= mean they don't want to differentiate? Using a different
selector is an a artifact of keys distribution; it doesn't re
