At 08:02 12-05-2011, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Keys Identified Mail WG
(dkim) to consider the following document:
- 'DKIM And Mailing Lists'
draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-10.txt as a BCP
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
On 12 May 2011, at 17:44, Hector Santos wrote:
For the record, the old MLM was read as well Levine's poison pill MLM.
With no intent nor suggest the writer is stupid, writers do say stupid
things and that paragraph was stupid then and it remains to be
stupid as in a stupid manner; he
Perhaps its a cultural thing. You should hear the number of the times
my Jewish wife had said; oh silly! stop being stupid! or New York,
Miami Cuban or Ricans cousins saying stupppid (its a special
prolonged funny emphasis), or Cuban exiles elders calling me a Stupid
Communist just
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of SM
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 12:16 AM
To: i...@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-10.txt (DKIM And
Mailing Lists) to BCP
Hi SM,
By
On 13/May/11 09:15, SM wrote:
In Section 4.1:
In an idealized world, if an author knows that the MLM to which a
message is being sent is a non-participating resending MLM, the
author SHOULD be cautious when deciding whether or not to send a
signed message to the list.
The
On 5/13/11 8:12 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
[...]
In such cases where the submission fails that test, the receiver or
verifier SHOULD discard the message but return an SMTP success code,
i.e. accept the message but drop it without delivery. An SMTP
rejection of such
Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
On 5/13/11 8:12 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
[...]
In such cases where the submission fails that test, the receiver or
verifier SHOULD discard the message but return an SMTP success code,
i.e. accept the message but drop it without delivery. An
I am wondering if anyone else can confirm BODY HASH errors with the
originating author domain DKIM signature mail submitted to the
IETF-SMTP fora.
The IETF-SMTP MLM does not resign and in addition, it does not change
the subject (adding [IETF-SMTP]) and does not appear to change the
body by
Hector Santos wrote:
Nothing wrong with DKIM=DISCARDABLE. What is wrong is trying to
dictate to others MLM should ignore ADSP.
As a MLM vendor, I have technical and ethical engineering obligation
not to cause problems when taking on a new inherently incompatible
technology that doesn't
