RE: Carry IP Packet in Ethernet Frame in IEEE 802.3 LLC Encapsulation Format

2000-04-04 Thread Lars Viklund
> I never see or heard any product use 802.3 LLC frame format > to carry IP > packet. But I am not sure I am correct. Does anyone knows > that some product > does use the LLC frame to carry IP packets and why? Our boxes (http://www.axis.com/products/) can use both Ethernet and 802.3 (RFC 1042

Re: Standards and patents

2000-04-04 Thread Scott Bradner
you might study history - our process used to be that way & we changed it to avoid problems that we found 1/ refusal to negotiate 2/ false patent claims to delay the process 3/ patent claims from people who have nothing to do with the standards process and the claim could be years after the s

Does anyone have the URL for the WIERD doc on Wireless?

2000-04-04 Thread Richard Shockey
The Wireless Hot topic discussed IAB BOF in OZ. tks. >> Richard Shockey Shockey Consulting LLC 8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110 St. Louis, MO 63119 Voice 314.918.9020 eFAX Fax to EMail 815.333.1237 (Preferred for Fax) INTERNET Mail & IFAX : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A thought about patents

2000-04-04 Thread Jon Crowcroft
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Graham Klyne typ ed: >>As many of us are finding, it seems to become more and more difficult to >>develop or implement a standard without tripping over somebody-or-other's >>patent for some piece of technology that many of us would regard as fairly >>obviou

Internet draft submissions

2000-04-04 Thread Graham Klyne
I have received conflicting statements on Internet draft submissions following the Adelaide cut-off: From the IETF-announce list: We will begin accepting submissions during the IETF (beginning March 27), but remember we are all in Adelaide and the processing will not begin until the f

Re: Does anyone have the URL for the WIERD doc on Wireless?

2000-04-04 Thread Jonathan Buschmann
Richard Shockey wrote: > The Wireless Hot topic discussed IAB BOF in OZ. > > tks. > http://home.earthlink.net/~serotonin/HotTopicWireless.htm

Re: A thought about patents

2000-04-04 Thread Henning Schulzrinne
Toerless Eckert wrote: > > > The problem is that a patent provides a presumption of validity. Thus, > > even if the patent ignores prior non-patent art, the creator of that > > prior (published) art has to spend time and money defending himself in > > court. Ultimately, that favors the big corpor

Re: Does anyone have the URL for the WIERD doc on Wireless?

2000-04-04 Thread Robert G. Ferrell
>The Wireless Hot topic discussed IAB BOF in OZ. You mean this one? http://home.earthlink.net/~serotonin/HotTopicWireless.htm RGF Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP Information Security Officer National Business Center, US DoI [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Privacy & law

2000-04-04 Thread Salvador Vidal
Hi folks and all, I think that as much conflicts that can be solved without the traditional way: regulation + represion = burocracy + injustice, will be better for users. Of course that always will remain Gansters that will require traditional represion ways, i.e.: At 02:25 02/04/00 +0300, Steph

Re: Standards and patents

2000-04-04 Thread Keith Moore
> IPR is taken into account > when it is time to advance a standard on the standards track and in practice, IPR is also taken into account by individual participants (if they know about it) when they decide whether to contribute to a consensus for Proposed Standard. Keith

GSM 900 /1800, UMTS bandwidth

2000-04-04 Thread Musandu
If you are using a GSM 900/1800 network for internet access what are the optimal bandwidth qualities, and what are the bandwidth qualities of existing UMTS networks? Yours truly, Nyagudi Musandu