> I never see or heard any product use 802.3 LLC frame format
> to carry IP
> packet. But I am not sure I am correct. Does anyone knows
> that some product
> does use the LLC frame to carry IP packets and why?
Our boxes (http://www.axis.com/products/) can use both
Ethernet and 802.3 (RFC 1042
you might study history - our process used to be that way & we changed it
to avoid problems that we found
1/ refusal to negotiate
2/ false patent claims to delay the process
3/ patent claims from people who have nothing to do with the standards process
and the claim could be years after the s
The Wireless Hot topic discussed IAB BOF in OZ.
tks.
>>
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting LLC
8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110
St. Louis, MO 63119
Voice 314.918.9020
eFAX Fax to EMail 815.333.1237 (Preferred for Fax)
INTERNET Mail & IFAX : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Graham Klyne typ
ed:
>>As many of us are finding, it seems to become more and more difficult to
>>develop or implement a standard without tripping over somebody-or-other's
>>patent for some piece of technology that many of us would regard as fairly
>>obviou
I have received conflicting statements on Internet draft submissions
following the Adelaide cut-off:
From the IETF-announce list:
We will begin accepting submissions during the IETF (beginning March
27), but remember we are all in Adelaide and the processing will not
begin until the f
Richard Shockey wrote:
> The Wireless Hot topic discussed IAB BOF in OZ.
>
> tks.
>
http://home.earthlink.net/~serotonin/HotTopicWireless.htm
Toerless Eckert wrote:
>
> > The problem is that a patent provides a presumption of validity. Thus,
> > even if the patent ignores prior non-patent art, the creator of that
> > prior (published) art has to spend time and money defending himself in
> > court. Ultimately, that favors the big corpor
>The Wireless Hot topic discussed IAB BOF in OZ.
You mean this one?
http://home.earthlink.net/~serotonin/HotTopicWireless.htm
RGF
Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Security Officer
National Business Center, US DoI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Hi folks and all,
I think that as much conflicts that can be solved without the traditional
way: regulation + represion = burocracy + injustice, will be better for users.
Of course that always will remain Gansters that will require traditional
represion ways, i.e.:
At 02:25 02/04/00 +0300, Steph
> IPR is taken into account
> when it is time to advance a standard on the standards track
and in practice, IPR is also taken into account by individual
participants (if they know about it) when they decide whether
to contribute to a consensus for Proposed Standard.
Keith
If you are using a GSM 900/1800 network for internet access what are the
optimal bandwidth qualities, and what are the bandwidth qualities of
existing UMTS networks?
Yours truly,
Nyagudi Musandu
11 matches
Mail list logo