On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 07:52:38 pm Niken Wijaya wrote:
I think I have to clarify that I used MBACK to do the normalization
instead of ATHENA. This might as well explain why I got such a high
value of y-axis offset, why you think I did not choose the right
parameters for the
Niken,
Have you compared MBACK to using the 'CLnorm' normalization in Athena
(found under Background Removal Additional Parameters)? The
algorithms are not identical, but have a lot in common, and would
probably make it easier to compare with other data in Athena. If I
understand correctly,
On 7/09/2011 7:24 AM, Bruce Ravel wrote:
On Sunday, September 04, 2011 08:52:30 pm Niken Wijaya wrote:
1. As you can see on the figure (i.e. filename: ifeffitlist-sample1
fitting), the intensity of the fitting spectra is higher than the actual
sample. This is I believe due to the higher
On Sunday, September 04, 2011 08:52:30 pm Niken Wijaya wrote:
1. As you can see on the figure (i.e. filename: ifeffitlist-sample1
fitting), the intensity of the fitting spectra is higher than the actual
sample. This is I believe due to the higher intensity of the individual
standard
